Re: Langevin's paradox again

Le 09/07/2024 à 17:35, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 09.07.2024 o 17:02, Python pisze:

Le 09/07/2024 à 16:54, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

...

It is. Apart of mumbling inconsistently -
the idiot didn't understand what yhe
human age is, how it is determined and
that clocks have nothing in common with
that.
Of course, an age of a human is determined
by subtracting his birthdate from the
current date. It always was.

>
*facepalm*
>
You stupidity is abysmal Wozniak.
>
When a person's age is unknown there are biological
ways to estimate it, you know?

You really think that

these methods are inaccurate?

 You really think they are not

So you cannot answer. No surprise.
Aging is a biological process. It matches with stationary
(respectively with the person's body) clocks and not with
moving clocks. This is a fact.
As a matter of fact metabolism is a kind of clock.

poor stinker

Nice signature Wozniak. For instance your level of stench
is a indication of your age. You are definitely degrading
quite fast.