Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 18. Jul 2024, 18:54:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v7bkir$2h9g3$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 18.07.2024 08:40, skrev Thomas Heger:
Am Mittwoch000017, 17.07.2024 um 14:34 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
>
The Special Theory of Relativity is precisely defined,
and there is no debate of what it is.
(Among reasonable knowledgeable people.)
>
 You could regard as 'SRT' also the modern version(-s) of Einstein's origional theory.
 This would be the relations in 'flat' space, where objects fly in streigth lateral motion and non-accelerated objects.
The one and only Special Theory of Relativity is only
valid in "flat spacetime" where there is no gravitation.
In flat spacetime non accelerated objects will move along
straight lines in an inertial frame of reference.
But accelerated objects can move in along any curve depending
on the accelerating force. Obviously!
Examples of accelerated motion in flat spacetime:
https://paulba.no/pdf/TwinsByMetric.pdf

I would regard this interpretation of 'SRT' as perfectly possible, too.
There is no interpretation of SR where objects can't accelerate.

 This is the 'special' case of GR, which covers accelerated FoRs.
GR simplifies to SR when there is no gravitation.
Both SR and GR "covers accelerated frames of reference".
But SR only in flat spacetime.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Jul 24 * Re: Langevin's paradox again161Thomas Heger
9 Jul 24 `* Re: Langevin's paradox again160Richard Hachel
9 Jul 24  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again5Python
9 Jul 24  i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Python
9 Jul 24  i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i    `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Python
9 Jul 24  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again10Maciej Wozniak
9 Jul 24  i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again9Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Python
10 Jul 24  i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again7Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Python
10 Jul 24  i    +* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Python
10 Jul 24  i    i+* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24  i    ii`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Python
10 Jul 24  i    i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  i    `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Thomas Heger
10 Jul 24  i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again141Paul.B.Andersen
10 Jul 24   +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24   +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again138Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again137Paul.B.Andersen
11 Jul 24     +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     +* Re: Langevin's paradox again29Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24     i+* Re: Langevin's paradox again22Paul.B.Andersen
12 Jul 24     ii+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24     ii`* Re: Langevin's paradox again20Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24     ii `* Re: Langevin's paradox again19Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24     ii  +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24     ii  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again17Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24     ii   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again16Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24     ii    +* Re: Langevin's paradox again14Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24     ii    i+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Python
15 Jul 24     ii    i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again12Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24     ii    i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again11Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24     ii    i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again10Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24     ii    i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again9Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24     ii    i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24     ii    i     `* Re: Langevin's paradox again7Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24     ii    i      `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24     ii    i       +* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24     ii    i       i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24     ii    i       i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24     ii    i       i  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24     ii    i       `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Stefan Ram
16 Jul 24     ii    `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Haynh Molnár Jue
12 Jul 24     i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
12 Jul 24     i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24     i i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24     i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24     i i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24     i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24     `* Re: Langevin's paradox again104Stefan Ram
11 Jul 24      +* Re: Langevin's paradox again102Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24      i+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
11 Jul 24      i+- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Athel Cornish-Bowden
12 Jul 24      i+* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Mikko
12 Jul 24      ii`* Re: Langevin's paradox again7Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Jul 24      ii +* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Mikko
14 Jul 24      ii i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24      ii i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      ii i  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Finis Maryanna
14 Jul 24      ii `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      ii  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Athel Cornish-Bowden
12 Jul 24      i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again91Paul.B.Andersen
12 Jul 24      i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again83Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again82Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again80Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again79Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Conard Lèmmi
14 Jul 24      i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again5Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24      i i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Thomas Heger
14 Jul 24      i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again70Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again69Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24      i i i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again68Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again67Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24      i i i     +* Re: Langevin's paradox again65Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i     i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again64Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24      i i i     i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again36Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again35Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again34Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again33Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   +* Re: Langevin's paradox again20Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again19Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again18Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again17Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again16Richard Hachel
18 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again15Paul.B.Andersen
18 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     +* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Richard Hachel
19 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again7J. J. Lodder
19 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Richard Hachel
18 Jul 24      i i i     i i   i     `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Jean-Michel Affoinez y Lopez-Francos
16 Jul 24      i i i     i i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again12Python
15 Jul 24      i i i     i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again27Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24      i i i     `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24      i i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24      i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24      i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24      i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24      i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
11 Jul 24      `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal