Re: tau egality in relalivity

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: tau egality in relalivity
De : python (at) *nospam* invalid.org (Python)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 19. Jul 2024, 23:08:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : CCCP
Message-ID : <v7eo50$35ppm$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Le 19/07/2024 à 22:04, Richard Hachel a écrit :
What Python doesn't understand.
Python firmly believes that in any case, two observers following different spatio-temporal "paths" cannot have the same proper time.
I explained to him that yes, by affirming that if two observers traveled equal distances, with equal times their own times would be equal (under the condition that the departure of the accelerated traveler is at rest). Python categorically refuses to drink this kind of milk, because he "didn't learn SR like that."
No this is not why. I refuses your claim because I can prove it
largely absurd in its formulation and WRONG :
What you called above "equal distances" is equality of spacial
part of two trajectories. This is a frame dependent property.
But the conclusion is about elapsed proper times, which does not
depend on a choice of frame (it is "absolute"). This is a HUGE
logical problem. A frame dependent property cannot imply a frame
independent (except of course, if the latter is always true, which
is the case in Galilean Relativity, but the your claim is just
pointless).
Then you add the condition that elapsed [improper] times are equal,
which is always as the time between any pair or events is unique,
it cannot have two values as seen in a given frame of reference.
So this condition is void.
Your claim is dead in the water at first read by any decent
person. You are not, by the way : you are a mentally ill egomaniac
fool.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Jul 24 * tau egality in relalivity17Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 `* Re: tau egality in relalivity16Python
20 Jul 24  `* Re: tau egality in relalivity15Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24   `* Re: tau egality in relalivity14Python
20 Jul 24    +* Re: tau egality in relalivity6Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24    i`* Re: tau egality in relalivity5Python
20 Jul 24    i `* Re: tau egality in relalivity4Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24    i  `* Re: tau egality in relalivity3Python
20 Jul 24    i   `* Re: tau egality in relalivity2Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24    i    `- Re: tau egality in relalivity1Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24    `* Re: tau egality in relalivity7Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24     `* Re: tau egality in relalivity6Python
20 Jul 24      +* Re: tau egality in relalivity2Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24      i`- Re: tau egality in relalivity1Python
21 Jul 24      `* Re: tau egality in relalivity3Richard Hachel
21 Jul 24       `* Re: tau egality in relalivity2Python
21 Jul 24        `- Re: tau egality in relalivity1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal