Re: Incorrect mathematical integration

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Incorrect mathematical integration
De : python (at) *nospam* invalid.org (Python)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 24. Jul 2024, 21:45:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : CCCP
Message-ID : <v7rp4e$1so3g$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Le 24/07/2024 à 22:41, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 24.07.2024 o 22:27, Python pisze:
Le 24/07/2024 à 20:45, Paul.B.Andersen a écrit :
Den 24.07.2024 15:08, skrev Richard Hachel:
Le 24/07/2024 à 14:47, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>
Measured in the lab frame the proton is moving around
the L = 27 km long ring in T = 90.0623065140618 μs.
The very real speed of the proton relative to the lab is
v = L/T =  0.999999991·c
>
γ = 7460
>
Measured in the proton frame, the length of the ring is
L' = L/γ = 3.6193029490616624 m.
The proton is moving around the L' long ring in the time
 τ = T/γ = 12.072695243171824 ns
The very real speed of the lab relative to the proton is
v =  L'/τ = (L/γ)/(T/γ ) = L/T = 0.999999991·c
>
This should be blazingly obvious for anybody but complete morons:
>
If the proton is passing a point in the ring with the speed v
relative to the point, then the point in the ring is passing
the proton a the speed v relative to the proton.
>
A bit more precisely put:
In the lab frame the proton is passing a point in the ring with
the speed v = L/T =  0.999999991·c.
In the proton frame the point in the ring is passing the proton with
the speed v = (L/γ)/τ = 0.999999991·c.
>
>
This is the only interesting sentence in your post.
The rest is just nonsense or tautology.
>
Indeed, if the proton passes at Vo=0.999991 c (for example) at a point A of the device, then the laws of physics state that point A passes at Vo=0.999991c.
>
>
If we transpose into real speed Vr, we have:
Vr=Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c)=235.7c
>
Nothing is moving at the speed L/τ = 235.7c
>
>
Likewise, this real speed is reciprocal.
>
The reciprocal of L/τ is (L/γ)/T = 0.0001340c
>
Equally meaningless. Not the speed of anything.
>
>
In the proton frame, it is point A which passes near it at Vr=235.7c.
>
In the proton frame the point in the ring is passing the proton with
the speed v = (L/γ)/τ = 0.999999991·c.
>
>
Now what does the global ring look like in the proton frame of reference, and above all what is the trajectory of point A during one revolution?
>
Irrelevant.
>
The point A is at any instant adjacent to the proton.
We consider an arbitrary instant I.
>
Let K(x,t) be an inertial frame of reference which at the instant I
is momentarily comoving with the point A.
>
The speed of the proton in K is v = dx/dt = L/T =  0.999999991·c
>
Do you know another definition of the speed of the proton in K
than dx/dt ?
>
Let K'(x',τ) be an inertial frame of reference which at the instant I
is momentarily comoving with the proton.
>
The speed of the point A in K' is v' = dx'/dτ = (L/γ)/τ = 0.999999991·c
>
Do you know another definition of the speed of the point A in K'
than  dx'/dτ ?
>
This is a good relativistic physics question.
>
Have fun answering this question...
>
I hope you have a lot of fun.
>
>
Quite.
But your jokes aren't funny the umpteenth time they are told,
It is getting boring.
>
We are dealing on fr.sci.* with this idiot for thirty years, go figure!
  And whatever you say - Poincare
... would kick your asses: yours and Lengrand's.

poor stinker
Nice signature Wozniak.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Jul 24 * Incorrect mathematical integration99Richard Hachel
19 Jul 24 +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration11gharnagel
19 Jul 24 i+- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 i+* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration8Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 ii`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration7gharnagel
20 Jul 24 ii +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Willliam Zdunowski
20 Jul 24 ii `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration5Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 ii  `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4gharnagel
20 Jul 24 ii   +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Python
20 Jul 24 ii   `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 ii    `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1gharnagel
20 Jul 24 i`- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24 +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Mikko
20 Jul 24 i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Stefan Ram
20 Jul 24 i `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24 `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration84Paul.B.Andersen
20 Jul 24  +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24  `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration82Richard Hachel
21 Jul 24   `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration81Paul.B.Andersen
21 Jul 24    +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration13Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24    i+- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Mikko
22 Jul 24    i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration11Paul.B.Andersen
22 Jul 24    i +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2gharnagel
23 Jul 24    i i`- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24    i +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24    i +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24    i +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration5Richard Hachel
23 Jul 24    i i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4Paul.B.Andersen
23 Jul 24    i i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Richard Hachel
23 Jul 24    i i  +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Darren Kalishewsky Tong
24 Jul 24    i i  `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Paul.B.Andersen
23 Jul 24    i `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Dawn Oborotov
21 Jul 24    +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Richard Hachel
21 Jul 24    i`- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
21 Jul 24    `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration65Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24     +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Ronnal Baikovski
22 Jul 24     `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration63Paul.B.Andersen
22 Jul 24      +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24      +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24      +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24      +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24      `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration58Richard Hachel
23 Jul 24       `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration57Paul.B.Andersen
24 Jul 24        +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24        +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24        +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Brendan Grammatakakis
24 Jul 24        +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24        `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration52Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24         `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration51Paul.B.Andersen
24 Jul 24          +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration35Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24          i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration34Paul.B.Andersen
24 Jul 24          i +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration24Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24          i i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration23Paul.B.Andersen
24 Jul 24          i i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration22Richard Hachel
25 Jul 24          i i  `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration21Paul.B.Andersen
25 Jul 24          i i   +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration19Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24          i i   i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration18Paul.B.Andersen
26 Jul 24          i i   i +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4Python
26 Jul 24          i i   i i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Maciej Wozniak
26 Jul 24          i i   i i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Python
26 Jul 24          i i   i i  `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
26 Jul 24          i i   i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration13Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24          i i   i  `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration12Paul.B.Andersen
26 Jul 24          i i   i   +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Richard Hachel
27 Jul 24          i i   i   i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Thomas Heger
27 Jul 24          i i   i   i `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Stanton Paraskevopoulos
26 Jul 24          i i   i   +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Richard Hachel
27 Jul 24          i i   i   i`- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Trejo Belmonte
26 Jul 24          i i   i   +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24          i i   i   `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration5Richard Hachel
27 Jul 24          i i   i    `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4Paul.B.Andersen
27 Jul 24          i i   i     +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Mordechai De la fontaine
27 Jul 24          i i   i     `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Maciej Wozniak
27 Jul 24          i i   i      `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Millard Czajkowski
27 Jul 24          i i   `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Keaton Bodó
24 Jul 24          i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration9Python
24 Jul 24          i  +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration7Maciej Wozniak
24 Jul 24          i  i+* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4Python
24 Jul 24          i  ii`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Maciej Wozniak
24 Jul 24          i  ii `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Python
25 Jul 24          i  ii  `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
25 Jul 24          i  i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Richard Hachel
25 Jul 24          i  i `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
24 Jul 24          i  `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Delbert Baram
24 Jul 24          +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Maciej Wozniak
24 Jul 24          i`- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
25 Jul 24          `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration13Ross Finlayson
25 Jul 24           `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration12Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24            +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration5gharnagel
26 Jul 24            i+- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24            i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24            i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2gharnagel
28 Jul 24            i  `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Clancy De santigo
26 Jul 24            `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration6Ross Finlayson
26 Jul 24             `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration5Richard Hachel
27 Jul 24              `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4Ross Finlayson
27 Jul 24               `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Ross Finlayson
27 Jul 24                +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Sixto Shibanuma
28 Jul 24                `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal