Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics

Le 10/08/2024 à 18:26, Richard Hachel a écrit :

Le 10/08/2024 à 18:14, Python a écrit :

Le 10/08/2024 à 18:09, gharnagel a écrit :

On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:29:23 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 10.08.2024 o 15:02, gharnagel pisze:

>
At first, Einstein was ignored, and it took quite a while for
the PTB to come around.  But it didn't happen until experimental
evidence prevailed.

>
Only such an idiot believe these nonsensical
ideological lies, Harrie, and the mumble of
the idiot was not even consistent.

>
Wozzie has told so many lies, he can't discern truth from his
outrageous fantasies :-))

>
It is actually not a lie if he really believes his fallacious claims
to be true.
>
IMHO he is demented and dumb enough to actually believe his unsound
"arguments".

 Ah, te voilà, toi?
 Je te croyais disparu sous la claque que tu t'es prise, et qui portait sur Nostradamus.
 Je t'ai demandé d'expliquer le quatrain (ce que j'ai fait, et qui n'a rien à voir avec tes conneries de Louis XIV) et de me montrer si, avec tes immenses talents d'historiens ou de critique, tu pouvais me prouver que cela avait été écris avant 1660.
Magnes toi un peu les couilles, au lieu de faire le con sur usenet.

[for non French-speaking readers: M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand is
babbling some unclear claims about Nostradamus' "predictions" here]
I don't give a sh*t on this new stupid hobby of yours. I would,
anyway, be concerned if I lived in Saint-Izan-de-Soudiac and a
local country Doctor was fond of this kind of demented nonsense.