Re: Relativistic aberration

Le 13/08/2024 à 02:08, Ross Finlayson a écrit :

On 08/12/2024 04:49 PM, Python wrote:

Le 13/08/2024 à 01:44, gharnagel a écrit :

...  Considering all the evidence that's
coming out about an afterlife,
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven
>
he should really be worried about his future:
>
"But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone: which is the second
death." -- Revelation 21:8

>
Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
>
>
>

 Perhaps you'd be happier with "odd" instead of "weird",
it's even less letters to spell and mouth out a word,
for your infantile in-group out-casting.
 It seems he's reflecting upon that according to some
popular theories of justice delivered eventually,
that liars, gossips, and such are doomed to an
eternity of deprivation, strife, and agony.
 Of course it's not scientific to even aver the existence
of the soul, it's super-scientific, and such notions of
the deserved and the after-life according to morals
doesn't mean much, to many.
 For a long time though it kept a lot of bad behavior in check.
 There was also for those who aren't carrot-and-stick types
that there are carrots like that being nice and enlightened
might allow karma to see reincarnation in a higher form,
vis-a-vis, how you say, a usual theory where it's worm-food.
  Anyways though the clocks on-board the GPS satellites
both advise and are advised what's measure according to
their moving dead-reckoning, as with regards to the
ephemeris, which everybody knows is Parameterized Post-Newtonian,
which is not the same as "defined by Special Relativity",
while though it is defined by a kind of Relativity,
just, not the one most think they have.

Ross, could you refrain from adding nonsense to nonsense? Thanks.