Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental Blockage

Le 23/08/2024 à 08:14, Thomas Heger a écrit :

Am Donnerstag000022, 22.08.2024 um 12:58 schrieb Python:
...

It is. It is explained in my initial post : What is (AB)/c to you?

>
AB was actually meant as:
>
distance from A to B,
>
even if A and B are in fact position vectors, hence AB would usually be the scalar product of A and B (what is absurd).

>
Yes it would be absurd. BTW you are conflating affine spaces with
vector spaces here.
>

Besides of this little formal issue (actually meant was |r_AB| ),

>
Well, Thomas, this is utterly ridiculous. Any reader understands what
AB as it appears in 2AB/(t'_A - t_A) is the distance AB. From high
school to Ph. D.

>
"the distance AB" is not equal to "AB"!

>
The distance between A and B can be denoted in a lot of ways. The point
is to ensure that there is no ambiguity given the context. As a matter
of fact Einstein in the ORIGINAL paper used an overbar on top of
AB (https://myweb.rz.uni-augsburg.de/~eckern/adp/history/einstein-papers/1905_17_891-921.pdf)
>
So if there were someone to blame here, it would be the translator.
>

>
>
I wrote annotations from a certain perspective:
>
I treated the text in question as homework of a student and myself as hypothetical professor, who had to write corrections for that paper.

>
You cannot pretend to be a professor, even hypothetical, when dealing
with subject you are both ignorant of and too stupid to understand.

 I have already written, that this is a certain perspective of writing.
 I could - for instance - write a novel from the perspective of JFK, after being shot.
 You could complain, this is not possible.
 Sure, most likely this isn't.
 BUT: it's the author, who choses the writing perspective and not the reader.

The reader can evaluate the quality and soundness of a text. Yours
is abysmally bad and absolutely unsound.