Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation

Le 23/08/2024 à 14:20, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :

Le 23/08/2024 à 14:03, Mikko a écrit :

On 2024-08-23 11:15:38 +0000, Richard Hachel said:
>

When I read the contributors to the French and Anglo-Saxon forums, when
I read Einstein (three lines of explanation) or Poincaré (one line of
explanation), I realize that it is very insufficient.

>
You are free to read other authors if you think those two are insufficient.
After all, they have had more time to think how to explain, probably also
more experience about explaining.

 Lire ne suffit pas.
 Chacun lit ce que d'autres ont lu, et on tourne en rond.
 Il faut ré-écrire les choses, et si possible en langage universellement compréhensible, afin que cela soit clair pour tous, et qu'on arrête un peu ce grand bluff minkowskien qui pourrit l'histoire de l'humanité.

It is quite contradictory to praise for the use of a comprehensible language in *French* into a English-speaking group.