Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 10. Sep 2024, 11:05:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbp5j0$2taov$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 10.09.2024 07:42, skrev rhertz:
 WHY THE ASSERTION ABOUT RELATIVITY BEING A PSEUDOSCIENCE? THE FOLLOWING
APPLY:
 1) As the distance between both reference frames is increasing
constantly, the communication of data between both frames is IMPOSSIBLE
to exist while exchanging information about time and position of both
frames, even using light as a carrier of data. Both origins will be
always out of sync, even when ghost observers, located at both origins,
are trying to communicate between them.
 
Hilarious, no? :-D

2) Therefore, the only way to PRETEND that remote data (x,t, x', t') is
KNOWN, is by using a couple of formulae (Lorentz, Poincaré), TO COMPUTE
at each frame time and position of the other frame.
This is THE FATAL CONCEPTUAL ERROR OF RELATIVITY.
 Using Lorentz transforms introduces (ARTIFICIALLY: just mathematics), a
NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOR of space and time, which is a mere function of the
differential velocity v.
  Due to this, remote sensing IS IMPOSSIBLE, because both frames are being
increasingly separated, and remote sensing is always out of sync.
Considering that the CORE of special relativity is that (Lorentz), time
and space ARE DIFFERENT at each frame, a valid exchange of information
(x,t, x', t') between observers at both frames IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE.
  So, the ONLY CHANCE that an observer at any frame has, in order to know
time and space value AT THE OTHER FRAME is TO BELIEVE that mathematics
(not observations) give the desired answers.
Absolutely beautiful, Richard.
Your sense of humour has really evolved during your
absence from this forum!

YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE IN LORENTZ EQUATIONS AS THE HOLY GRAIL OF A NEW
PHYSICS.
 To make things MUCH WORSE, you HAVE TO BELIEVE that in particle
accelerators, the full set of data is obtained with "real measurements".
But for this to happens, a disgraceful hypothesis has to be introduced:
THAT AT THE END POINT (COLLISIONS OR DECAYS), BOTH REFERENCE FRAMES
MERGES INTO ONE, WHERE DETECTORS ARE LOCATED.
Quite.
  Accelerators work because the physicist BELIEVE IN LORENTZ
  EQUATIONS and have designed the accelerators according to SR.
Or was your point that they don't work?
If the accelerators work it is a confirmation of SR.
So no, they don't work. They are part of the great conspiracy,
and all the physicist designing and operating them are frauds who
say whatever they have to say to keep their jobs.
 After all, physicists have the right to eat and to maintain a family
(while living in shame).
 
Well said, Richard!
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Sep 24 * Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.14rhertz
10 Sep 24 +* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.12Paul.B.Andersen
10 Sep 24 i+* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.3gharnagel
10 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.2rhertz
11 Sep 24 ii `- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Sep 24 i`* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.8LaurenceClarkCrossen
11 Sep 24 i `* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.7rhertz
11 Sep 24 i  +- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Python
11 Sep 24 i  +* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
11 Sep 24 i  i`- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i  +- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i  +- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i  `- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
10 Sep 24 `- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1LaurenceClarkCrossen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal