Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 10. Oct 2024, 09:01:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <ve81ld$333o4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-10-09 12:28:27 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

Le 09/10/2024 à 11:43, Mikko a écrit :
On 2024-10-07 21:46:42 +0000, Richard Hachel said:
 
Le 07/10/2024 à 23:10, film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) a écrit :
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 22:52:42 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
 
Just gobbledygook.
 Voilà un mot bien hardi envers le docteur Hachel, et surtout bien injuste.
 If you don't like that word then learn to use the Common Language.
 Dr. Richard Hachel is probably one of the Usenet posters most attached to the meaning of language and most saddened by the fog of words.
The important thing to learn is not the meanings of the words but the
words of the meanings.
The fog of words can be largely avoided by the use of equations. Words
are only needed when the equations need be connected to the real world.
For that purpose one should use well known words as much as possible and
definitions whenever the usual dictionary meaning is too obscure or
vague.

Especially the fog of concepts in SR, where it is very difficult for the novice, or even the big shot, to understand what he himself is saying (the relativistic Joe Biden phenomenon).
The concepts of SR are not foggy. If some presentation is then try some
other one or ask here.

I have never introduced words, principles, or concepts without a precise idea of ​​what I was saying.
An idea is not sufficient. The best option is to avoid introduction of
new words and the second best to present good definitions. New principles
are not principles of SR so not applicable in this context. New concepts
must be related to the original ones. If that cannot be done they are
not relevant in this context.

And if you look closely, I have only introduced two new words (anisochrony and chronotropy) and four new concepts (elasticity of distances which is responsible for a spatial zoom effect definitively explaining the Langevin paradox, more accurate calculation of the proper times of accelerated objects, radial contraction of the relativistic disk,
vision of the universe live for any observer).
And they have served no useful purpose.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Oct 24 * the notion of relativity of simultaneity71Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity40Python
1 Oct 24 i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity36Thomas Heger
1 Oct 24 ii+- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
1 Oct 24 ii`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity34Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 ii `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity33Python
1 Oct 24 ii  +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 ii  i`- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
2 Oct 24 ii  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity30Thomas Heger
2 Oct 24 ii   +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity26Python
2 Oct 24 ii   i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct 24 ii   ii`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
2 Oct 24 ii   ii `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct 24 ii   i+- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity21Thomas Heger
3 Oct 24 ii   i +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Python
3 Oct 24 ii   i i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
3 Oct 24 ii   i i  `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity5Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
3 Oct 24 ii   i ii`- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
5 Oct 24 ii   i i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
5 Oct 24 ii   i i `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity11Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii   i  +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
5 Oct 24 ii   i  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity9Thomas Heger
5 Oct 24 ii   i   `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity8Richard Hachel
6 Oct 24 ii   i    `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity7Thomas Heger
6 Oct 24 ii   i     +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
6 Oct 24 ii   i     `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity5Richard Hachel
8 Oct 24 ii   i      `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Thomas Heger
8 Oct 24 ii   i       `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Maciej Wozniak
11 Oct 24 ii   i        `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
11 Oct 24 ii   i         `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
2 Oct 24 ii   `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
3 Oct 24 ii    `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Thomas Heger
3 Oct 24 ii     `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Richard Hachel
1 Oct 24 i +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
2 Oct 24 i `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Mikko
7 Oct 24 +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity27JanPB
7 Oct 24 i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity26Richard Hachel
8 Oct 24 i +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Python
8 Oct 24 i i`- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
9 Oct 24 i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity23Mikko
9 Oct 24 i  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity22Richard Hachel
10 Oct 24 i   `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity21Mikko
10 Oct 24 i    `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity20Richard Hachel
11 Oct 24 i     `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity19Mikko
11 Oct 24 i      +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
12 Oct 24 i      `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity17Thomas Heger
12 Oct 24 i       `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity16Mikko
12 Oct 24 i        +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Maciej Wozniak
12 Oct 24 i        `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity14Richard Hachel
12 Oct 24 i         +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity9Python
12 Oct 24 i         i+* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Maciej Wozniak
12 Oct 24 i         ii`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Python
12 Oct 24 i         ii `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Maciej Wozniak
12 Oct 24 i         ii  `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
12 Oct 24 i         i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity4Richard Hachel
13 Oct 24 i         i `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Python
13 Oct 24 i         i  `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Maciej Wozniak
13 Oct 24 i         i   `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Python
13 Oct 24 i         +* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Thomas Heger
13 Oct 24 i         i`* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity2Richard Hachel
14 Oct 24 i         i `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Thomas Heger
13 Oct 24 i         `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Mikko
14 Oct 24 `* Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity3Sylvia Else
14 Oct 24  +- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Richard Hachel
14 Oct 24  `- Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal