Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.

Den 25.01.2025 05:46, skrev rhertz:

Curiously, ChatGPT is trained to give a lot of excuses for the fact that
relativity (any) breaks down at depths lower than 10^-09 m (1 nm), but
it's also trained to validate GR up to the limit of the visible universe
(about 13.5 bly classical radius or 46 bly relativistic radius).

Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) is based on SR, not NM.
SR doesn't break down at depths lower than 10^-09 m

 It represents a domain of applicability with a ratio of upper and lower
limits of 5 x 10^35. Cosmologists apply time dilation formulae to
galaxies 10 bly far away, which are captured as a few pixels with Hubble
Ultra Deep Field resolution, which takes almost 11 days to collect
photons for a 16 pixels pic, and still use it to gather information
about speed of recession, speculate about shape, etc.

You have claimed that we can do without relativity (SR and GR)
because Newtonian mechanics can correctly predict everything
that SR/GR can predict.
(If the predictions are different, you claim NM is right.)
Can NM "explain" any of the phenomena listed below?
Do you think it is a weakness of SR that it can't "explain"
these phenomena?

 But not a single relativist can explain the behavior of two atoms (like
Ag) that act as emitter and receiver of photons in the visible range,
separated by a distance of 1 mm, for example.

Since all physicists accept SR and GR as valid theories, you are
claiming that no physicist can "explain" the above.
That's wrong.
This is about interaction photon - electron,
and can be "explained" by QED. (Based on SR, not NM)
(That doesn't necessarily mean that someone has done it, though.)

 Like the phenomenon of sonoluminescence, in which atoms in water are
excited by sound waves and generate blobs of high luminescence and
extreme temperature, within a glass container.
 The physics behind how sound waves are transformed into light in the
blue-violet part of the spectrum is not understood, even when it was
discovered almost 90 years ago.

Not to mention if TIME, as known in the macroworld, apply equally in the
quantum world. Or what the speed of light really is in the atomic and
subatomic realm.

Remember that in current physics, "photon" is defined in QED.
Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) is based on SR.
So TIME is the same in the quantum world as in SR.
And the speed of light is invariant c in the atomic realm.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/