Sujet : Re: DeepSeek
De : x (at) *nospam* x.org (x)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativityDate : 28. Jan 2025, 09:37:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vna510$1n2li$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 1/27/25 18:23, The Starmaker wrote:
Physfitfreak wrote:
>
On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Physfitfreak wrote:
>
On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
I just started testing deepseek...
>
and it passed with flying colors!
>
>
Next post will show you my test and results...
>
>
You could not do that with chatgpt?
>
it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.
>
>
>
Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable
that capability as well as fooling the users.
>
I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally
science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle
it right.
>
Science will go where it belongs!
Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of
Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.
You gotta have the password to use GodMode.
Evil is a parasitism of the good.
In fiction Satan wields a pitchfork and the supreme being
has a halo.
In reality they both look exactly the same.
Re: DeepSeek
Re: DeepSeek