Re: Muon paradox

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Muon paradox
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 05. Apr 2025, 10:32:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vsqt2b$1s7ad$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 04.04.2025 23:15, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 12:55:38 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
A muon has a mean lifetime = 2.2 μs in its rest frame.
The same muon, at the same time, has a mean lifetime 85.36 μs
in the Earth-frame.
>
Time dilation is the phenomenon that the measured time
between two events on an object's world-line depend
on the frame of reference in which it is measured.
>
The 2.2 μs and 85.36 μs are two different times between
the same two events on the same muon.
The difference is that the two times are measured in two
different frames of reference.
>

The muons move ten times further down in Earth's atmosphere than they
are expected to from measurements in the laboratory of their lifetimes
and speeds. This is not a matter of perspective or reference frames.
The "time dilation" is exactly as expected and predicted by SR.

 You have proven unable to even attempt to explain the cause of the time
dilation of the muons coming from high in Earth's atmosphere according
to relativity.
Didn't you read the above?
So read it now:
A muon has a mean lifetime = 2.2 μs in its rest frame.
The same muon, at the same time, has a mean lifetime 85.36 μs
in the Earth-frame.
Time dilation is the phenomenon that the measured time
between two events on an object's world-line depend
on the frame of reference in which it is measured.
The 2.2 μs and 85.36 μs are two different times between
the same two events on the same muon.
The difference is that the two times are measured in two
different frames of reference.

 Time dilation is not a phenomenon.
Call it whatever you want.
"Time dilation" as predicted by SR is _proven_ to exist.

 You conflate longer lifetimes with time dilation.
It is still meaningless to say that muons live longer than themself.
REPEAT:
The muon has but one life. It is this one life that
is 2.2 μs when measured in the rest frame of the muon,
and  85.36 μs when measured in Earth-frame.
You seem to have a serious reading comprehension problem.
So I will repeat it again if you still haven't got it.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Mar 25 * Muon paradox130LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 +* Re: Muon paradox21LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 Mar 25 i`* Re: Muon paradox20LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i `* Re: Muon paradox19Richard Hachel
1 Apr 25 i  +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i  i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Muon paradox14guido wugi
1 Apr 25 i   +* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
1 Apr 25 i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Muon paradox9LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Muon paradox8Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i     +* Re: Muon paradox3Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i     i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i     i `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 i      `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr 25 i       +- Re: Muon paradox1Rubin Yablokov
2 Apr 25 i       `- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
1 Apr 25 +* Re: Muon paradox10LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i`* Re: Muon paradox9Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i +- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i `* Re: Muon paradox7LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr 25 i   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
2 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Muon paradox4LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 i     +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 i     `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 +* Re: Muon paradox91Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i+- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr 25 i+* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 ii+* Re: Muon paradox2Maciej Wozniak
1 Apr 25 iii`- Re: Muon paradox1Edilberto Gayazov
1 Apr 25 ii+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii `- Re: Muon paradox1Paul.B.Andersen
1 Apr 25 i+* Re: Muon paradox54LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Muon paradox53Paul.B.Andersen
2 Apr 25 ii +* Re: Muon paradox15LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr 25 ii i`* Re: Muon paradox14Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 ii i +* Re: Muon paradox12Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii i i`* Re: Muon paradox11Darling Vassilopulos
3 Apr 25 ii i i `* Re: Muon paradox10Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii i i  `* Re: Muon paradox9Richard Hachel
3 Apr 25 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr 25 ii i i   i`* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
5 Apr 25 ii i i   i `- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr 25 ii i i   +* Re: Muon paradox3Thomas Heger
4 Apr 25 ii i i   i+- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr 25 ii i i   i`- Re: Muon paradox1Thomas Heger
4 Apr 25 ii i i   `* Re: Muon paradox2Richard Hachel
4 Apr 25 ii i i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii i `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii +* Re: Muon paradox2Aether Regained
2 Apr 25 ii i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Apr 25 ii `* Re: Muon paradox35LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Apr 25 ii  `* Re: Muon paradox34Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 ii   +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 25 ii   +* Re: Muon paradox31LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Apr 25 ii   i`* Re: Muon paradox30Paul.B.Andersen
4 Apr 25 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox3Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr 25 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
4 Apr 25 ii   i +* Re: Muon paradox11LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i i`* Re: Muon paradox10Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr 25 ii   i i +- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
5 Apr 25 ii   i i +* Re: Muon paradox7LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr 25 ii   i i i`* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
6 Apr 25 ii   i i i +* Re: Muon paradox3LaurenceClarkCrossen
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i i`* Re: Muon paradox2Paul.B.Andersen
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i `* Re: Muon paradox2LaurenceClarkCrossen
7 Apr 25 ii   i i i  `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
6 Apr 25 ii   i i `- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
5 Apr 25 ii   i `* Re: Muon paradox15Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  +* Re: Muon paradox6Paul.B.Andersen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  i`- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
5 Apr 25 ii   i  `* Re: Muon paradox8LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Apr 25 ii   i   `* Re: Muon paradox7Paul.B.Andersen
6 Apr 25 ii   i    +* Re: Muon paradox4Richard Hachel
6 Apr 25 ii   i    i+- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
7 Apr 25 ii   i    i`* Re: Muon paradox2Thomas Heger
7 Apr 25 ii   i    i `- Re: Muon paradox1Richard Hachel
6 Apr 25 ii   i    +- Re: Muon paradox1Maciej Wozniak
7 Apr 25 ii   i    `- Re: Muon paradox1Paul.B.Andersen
3 Apr 25 ii   `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Apr 25 i+- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
9 Apr 25 i+* Re: Muon paradox4gharnagel
9 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Muon paradox3Paul.B.Andersen
9 Apr 25 ii `* Re: Muon paradox2gharnagel
10 Apr 25 ii  `- Re: Muon paradox1Shirley Dovgusha
10 Apr 25 i`* Re: Muon paradox24Aether Regained
1 Apr 25 +* Re: Muon paradox3Kent Bazhukov
8 Apr 25 `* Re: Muon paradox3Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal