Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
W dniu 17.10.2024 o 17:50, Python pisze:I didn't get such a proof. I got a utterly stupid argumentLe 17/10/2024 à 17:35, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :Not especially. You've got a logical proofW dniu 17.10.2024 o 17:09, Python pisze:"instead" because logic has a weight, can actually convince peopleLe 17/10/2024 à 16:55, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :>W dniu 17.10.2024 o 15:37, Python pisze:>Le 17/10/2024 à 15:26, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :>
..Wozniak might be able to find some followers:>
>
"There is no belief, however foolish, that will not gather
its faithful adherents who will defend it to the death."
-- Isaac Asimov
So far it seems that "one of best logicians Humanity ever
had" has gathered absolutely ZERO followers. How come :-) ?
That's simple: logic is overestimated
Have you considered the hypothesis that you overestimate yourself
instead?
Why - instead? those are independent.
that the [SR] was not
even consistent - are you convinced?
Not in my world.This brings some relevance to *my* claim :See, that's the whole power of logic. Instead
- You suck at logic
- You suck at physics> Moreover, as a member of Humanity, I claim that :
- You are a despicable human being
- You are only making a fool of yourself
convincing people it makes them raving,
spitting and slandering.
facepalm...were brainwashed by that shit.All decent people who took time to study Relativity>and it has really no power over stupidity and fanatism.>
So (almost) the whole word is wrong
Your moronic church is no way any whole world.
canNo. No proof in sight but utterly idiotic arguments fromrecognize that it is consistent.Still it was not. You've got a proof, all you
can do about it is spitting, slandering
and utterly idiotic asserting
poor stinkerNice signature.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.