Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
Den 15.03.2024 15:20, skrev Richard Hachel:Absolutely not.Le 15/03/2024 à 15:11, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :Right. You predict them like Newton did.I am saying that SR does not predict that accelerated objectsWe agree.
will behave as you claim they do.
The SR does not predict things the way I predict them.
Richard Hachel's equations:
Speed of rocket in inertial frame: Vr=a.Tr
Average speed of rocket in the inertial frame: Vrm=(1/2)Vr
Are correct only in Newtonian Mechanics with Galilean relativity.
So Richard Hachel's theory is identical to Newtonian Mechanics.
Je vous supplie de comprendre ce que je dis avant de juger.The problem, although enormous, is that experimentally I am credible and not the SR which cannot explain instantaneous transfers of information.Why should SR "explain" what doesn't exist?
You know of course that SR is thoroughly experimentally verified
and never falsified, while NM is falsified.
and that theoretically I do not have the enormous concern of completely inconsistent apparent speeds. if only in a simple Langevin paradox.Are there "inconsistent apparent speeds" in the "twin paradox"? :-D
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.