Re: The most ridiculous science mistake in history.

Larry wrote:

>
You have just demonstrated your utter lack of comprehension and your inability to rebut
my comments with any substantive statement.

A "comment" is not a valid argument.  I asked you to state what you believe are facts about
reality and justify their validity.  Your only response is a personal attack.  That's what
happens when one doesn't want to face reality.

The truth is that the LT correctly understood is the difference of arrival times of the
two beams in the MMX IF THE ETHER AND ETHER WIND EXIST.

The LT is a prediction about reality, which it does very, very well (within its domain of
applicability).  There are two different hypothetical theses that lead to the LT.  Can you
state them?

Because it was not detected it had to be claimed something exactly negated it hiding it.
The LT is just a calculation of that effect. To claim otherwise is utterly stupid and
ignorant.

Not really.  One concept is that moving rods really do contract and moving clocks really
do slow down.  This is called the Lorentz Ether Theory.  Can you define the other one?
(A theory that predicts reality is neither ignorant nor stupid, so please dispense with
such childishness.)