Re: The most ridiculous science mistake in history.

On 03/25/2024 06:48 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 25.03.2024 o 13:39, J. J. Lodder pisze:
>

Science is above all an economic representation of the world.
(by Ockham, Mach, and afaik all other philosophers of science)
It doesn't carry unnecessary unobservables along.

>
Unfortunately, ether isn't unnecessary,
even your idiot guru had to finally admit
it.
>
>

You know it's mathematical physics, and,
though there's a science of the study of
the theories of mathematics, many philosophers
of mathematics have that the objects of mathematics
are objective, and, that logicism and positivism
and empiricism as scientism as it were, though
I surely believe in the philosophy and the value
of science and that scientism isn't a bad thing:
the logicism and positivism are pretty much entirely
subject to the objective platonist realm of the
objects of mathematics, or, "mathematics is ubiquitously
successful, in models of physics".
Your transactional representation is quite pragmatic.
It doesn't quite define "true" or any belief in anything,
yet it's very common and many won't fault you for it.
When DesCartes wrote "I think, therefore I am",
that's noumenal, not just phenomenological, as
with regards to shared senses of thought and the
noumenal, which basically define formal "theory"
at all.
I.e., the observables are in mathematical terms.