Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul B. Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 01. Apr 2024, 21:00:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <uuf3lt$3orih$1@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 31.03.2024 14:30, skrev Richard Hachel:
Le 31/03/2024 à 14:07, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
Den 30.03.2024 14:31, skrev Richard Hachel:
 
Doctor Richard Hachel's theory is experimentally falsified.
 Can you show me a little fact of it.
Again? I have done it several times, but OK:
It is experimentally proved that the speed of protons
in the Large Hadron Collider never exceed c.
Richard Hachel's "theory" predicts that the speed of protons
in the Large Hadron Collider is  6927⋅c.
Richard Hachel's "theory" is falsified.

 A very small.
 And I am silent, gentlemen.
 Even the Nobel Prize winner Alain Aspect says that I am right about the principle of non-locality, 
Can you please explain how non-locality affects the predictions of SR?
Does it make any of the following confirmations of SR invalid?
https://paulba.no/paper/index.html

the greatest mathematician in the world, Henri Poincaré, says that I am right when I write "There will therefore exist an impenetrable limit speed which will extend to all particles, bodies and laws of the universe.
Quite.
And we know that the impenetrable limit speed is c.
So why do you claim that the speed of protons can be 6927⋅c?

I simply combine the two.
So if you combine non-locality and the principle that c is
an impenetrable limit speed, you find that the speed of
protons can be 6927⋅c ?

Scientists can't.
Who has the best theory? Hachel, or all a clique of stupid physicists who don't want to do science, but the poor cock competition?
Your falsified theory is obviously much better than
the theory that's never falsified.
Right? :-D
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Mar 24 * [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?54Richard Hachel
29 Mar 24 +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Mee'k Pagano Selvaggio
30 Mar 24 +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?46Paul B. Andersen
30 Mar 24 i+- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel
30 Mar 24 i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?44Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?43Paul B. Andersen
31 Mar 24 i  +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?26Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i  i+* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?6Volney
31 Mar 24 i  ii`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i  ii +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Gaylord Chalyh Turubanov
2 Apr 24 i  ii `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Volney
2 Apr 24 i  ii  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Mitchel Shirinkin Balahowski
2 Apr 24 i  ii  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Ren Christakos Haritopoulos
1 Apr 24 i  i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?19Paul B. Andersen
1 Apr 24 i  i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?18Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i  `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?17Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i  i   +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
3 Apr 24 i  i   i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr 24 i  i   i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
4 Apr 24 i  i   i  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 24 i  i   i  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i  i   +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i   `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?10Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i    `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?9Python
2 Apr 24 i  i     +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Python
2 Apr 24 i  i     `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?7Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i      `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?6Python
3 Apr 24 i  i       `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Python
3 Apr 24 i  i        `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 24 i  i         `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Python
4 Apr 24 i  i          `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?2Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr 24 i  i           `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Sammie Pásztor Buzás
31 Mar 24 i  `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?16Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i   +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?11Volney
31 Mar 24 i   i+- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Maciej Wozniak
31 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?9Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i   i +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?7Athel Cornish-Bowden
31 Mar 24 i   i i+* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
1 Apr 24 i   i ii`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Athel Cornish-Bowden
1 Apr 24 i   i ii `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
1 Apr 24 i   i ii  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Athel Cornish-Bowden
2 Apr 24 i   i ii  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
1 Apr 24 i   i i`- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1gharnagel
2 Apr 24 i   i `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
1 Apr 24 i   `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Paul B. Andersen
1 Apr 24 i    `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i     +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i     `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
2 Apr 24 +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 i `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?2JanPB
2 Apr 24  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal