Re: The impotence of Minkowskian relativists

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: The impotence of Minkowskian relativists
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul B. Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 07. Apr 2024, 12:12:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <uutuuf$bkko$2@i2pn2.org>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 06.04.2024 17:06, skrev Richard Hachel:
They are unable to fight against Doctor Hachel.
This should serve as a testimony to them.
No way.
Blinded by their madness, they behave like the captain of the Titanic....
"Captain, things are going badly, the hull didn't hold together, the ship is going to fall apart before it even has time to see America, there are leaks."
What does the captain do: “Speed up the ship, we must reach New York as quickly as possible”.
“Captain, the ship is going to fall apart!!!”
A very good analogy, indeed.
Paul is saying:
"Captain Hachel, your theory is full of holes and is sinking."
What does captain Hachel do?
Blinded by his madness he whines:

Always, always, always, the same phenomenon occurs again.
And what always, always, always, occurs again is that
Paul proves that Captain Richard Hachel's theory is full of
holes and has been sunk for 40 years.
And it occurs again:
It is experimentally proved that the speed of protons
in the Large Hadron Collider never exceed c.
Richard Hachel's "theory" predicts that the speed of protons
in the Large Hadron Collider is  6927⋅c.
Inevitable conclusion:
Richard Hachel's "theory" is falsified.
And then always, always, always, the same phenomenon occurs again:
Richard Hachel whines, but does not even comment the fact
that his theory is falsified.

 What matters in men (and women) is the size of their balls.
 The rest is just trivial considerations.
 Their balls are so beautiful...
I am not particularly interested in the size of your balls.
But why are you so preoccupied with the beauty of men's (and women's) balls?
--
Paul, having fun
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Apr 24 * The impotence of Minkowskian relativists10Richard Hachel
7 Apr 24 `* Re: The impotence of Minkowskian relativists9Paul B. Andersen
7 Apr 24  `* Re: The impotence of Minkowskian relativists8Richard Hachel
7 Apr 24   `* Re: The impotence of Minkowskian relativists7Paul B. Andersen
7 Apr 24    +- Re: The impotence of Minkowskian relativists1Maciej Wozniak
8 Apr 24    `* Re: The impotence of Minkowskian relativists5Richard Hachel
8 Apr 24     +* Re: The impotence of Minkowskian relativists2Richard Hachel
8 Apr 24     i`- Re: The impotence of Minkowskian relativists1Paul B. Andersen
8 Apr 24     +- Re: The impotence of Minkowskian relativists1Thaddeus Pantelakos Kefalas
8 Apr 24     `- Re: The impotence of Minkowskian relativists1Paul B. Andersen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal