Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
W dniu 11.04.2024 o 13:08, Python pisze:Don't be jealous, Maciej. You are as stupid as Thomas, even ifLe 11/04/2024 à 10:51, Thomas Heger a écrit :Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,Am 10.04.2024 um 15:30 schrieb J. J. Lodder:*facepalm*
>>>>>>
Also, perhaps our current state of the art technology wrt observing the
universe from our little earth is damn near pre embryonic wrt the grand
scheme of things... ;^)
>
Usual observations from our perspective of the universe would require to
remove the effects of the delay, which is caused by the finite speed of
light.
>
But this is not done.
Of course it is done!!!
>
You have definitely never read any paper about astronomy, or the history
of astronomy. As a matter of fact one of the main issue in astronomy is
to determine the distance of objects as precisely as possible.
>
Thomas, why are you constantly making up stuff of that kind? Is it malice
or stupidity?
>
Both?
Hanlon's razor applies, I think.
>
And for amusement: noting different delays of quasar fluctuations,
in passing through an Einstein lens, is a practical way
of establishing their cosmological distance,
Sure, the delay is known.
>
But how would you remove it?
>
The difference in time is actually HUGE, hence you would need to wait a VERY long time, if you want to know the present position of stars seen a few billion light years away.
Q. How to know what week day and month day will tomorrow be ?
and trying again to pretend he knows something.
Tell me, poor stinker, have you already learnt
what a function is? Are you still trying
to determine its properties applying a French
definition of a different word?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.