Re: Perfect clocks

W dniu 28.04.2024 o 22:52, gharnagel pisze:

Mikko wrote:

>
On 2024-04-27 19:50:34 +0000, gharnagel said:

>
Perhaps there is only one nature, but it has many parts.
The discussion seems to be about the part of nature called
"time" ...

>
Time is not a part of nature. If you remove time and everthing
that is in a time or is a part of time or is a property of time
or requires time to exist then nothing is left.

 But isn't nature dynamic?  Seasons change, animals live and die,
the earth gets older, stars evolve.  These require the concept of
time.

No, poor trash, these don't.
It's your text that does. Time is a
core element of our thinking/speaking
system.

 Isn't time both a concept AND a topic?  I suppose the same can be
said about nature.  So what?  How has that furthered the discussion?
 Wozzie lies about time by doing the opposite of disambiguating:

Your raving and insults won't help anything,
sane people will keep considering second
as 9 192 631 770 on Earth and 9 192 631 774
on a GPS satellite.
Common sense was warning your bunch of
idiots.