Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate

W dniu 12.05.2024 o 20:22, gharnagel pisze:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>

Am Freitag000019, 19.05.2023 um 20:23 schrieb Tom Roberts:

>
It OUGHT to be obvious that measurements by moving observers cannot
possibly affect the rod itself. So in that sense, "length

contraction"

is not "physical" -- the rod is not affected [#].

>
Doesn't poor halfbrain TR believe the results of Holy
Measurements?

 Poor eighth-brain is trying to obscure the whole situation once again.  He
pretends there is only one "Holy measurement" but the fact is that there are
many who can be making the measurement, each traveling at a different speed,
and each getting a different value.

And?
Can you, or can  poor idiot Tom - provide
many examples of things that are not physical
but are physically measured?
BTW, anyone cam check GPS, Harrie, your
results are existing only in your
delusional gedankenwelt.
Your raving and spitting won't help, you
can't enforce your madness on the real
measurements.