Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 12.05.2024 o 20:22, gharnagel pisze:

>
Poor eighth-brain is trying to obscure the whole situation once again.  He
pretends there is only one "Holy measurement" but the fact is that there are many who can be making the measurement, each traveling at a different speed, and each getting a different value.

>
And?

The "And?" is obvious to anyone having more than one-eighth of a brain:  WHICH
ONE IS THE "HOLY MEASUREMENT"?  Duh!

Can you, or can  poor idiot Tom - provide
many examples of things that are not physical
but are physically measured?

Suppose you measure the speed of an approaching airplane by sending two pulses
of light one second apart.  The first one travels a distance, d, to the plane
and is reflected back.  It leaves at t = t1 and returns at t = 2d/c.  The second
leaves at t = t1 + 1, travels a distance x = d - v and returns at t = 2(d - v)/c.
The time interval between the return of the pulses is Delta t = 2v/c.  So we have
a physical measurement.
With respect to the light pulse source,
(1) What is the velocity of the plane?
(2) What is the position of the plane? Are those "physical" measurements?

BTW, anyone cam check GPS, Harrie, your
results are existing only in your
delusional gedankenwelt.

Au contraire, eighth-brain, everyone but you knows you're lying.  Yon know it, too,
but you're too dishonest to admit it.  Anyone THAT dishonest must also be a fool.

Your raving and spitting won't help, you
can't enforce your madness on the real
measurements.

Pot, kettle, black.
“How much better would life be if a liar’s pants really did catch fire?
-- Rebel Circus