Re: NASA engineer creates propulsion system that defies the laws of physics

bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

bertietaylor wrote:
 

Aether Regained wrote:

[-]

@Arindam/@bertietaylor:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive

 

You might find the above article very informative, especially the section:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive#Experimental_errors

 
Thanks. Unless you spend a lot of public money doing useless stuff you
cannot get publication or any kind of recognition.

EM drive has been debunked, now also by experiment. Get over it.
[snip arindam nonsense]

Paused for a reply, got none, so conclude this is just another mendacious
effort by the Einsteinian cultists to push their e=mcc=hv dogma.

Nowadays true by definition of all of the SI units.
You can no longer do any kind of precision measurement
of anything at all without it.
Again, get over it. Your so-called 'Einstein cultists'
are all working professional physicists.
(of necessity)

Thermal effects like solar sail as I explained should explain the motion.

 
And for the possibly misled kiddies: Radiation effects on satellites
are not just caused by radiation pressure in vacuum.
There is also photon recoil from the emission of thermal photons.
(yes, by momentum conservation)
The net force depends on the balance of the two.

All of this has long since passed into applied engineering.
Those responsible for tracking sats, or for station keeping of them
take all of this into account routinely,

Jan