Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate

W dniu 13.05.2024 o 20:46, gharnagel pisze:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 13.05.2024 o 16:38, gharnagel pisze:

>
Maciej Wozniak prevaricated:

>
W dniu 13.05.2024 o 03:40, gharnagel pisze:

>
Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 12.05.2024 o 20:22, gharnagel pisze:

>
Poor eighth-brain is trying to obscure the whole situation

once > > > again.  He pretends there is only one "Holy measurement" but the

fact is that there are many who can be making the measurement,
each traveling at a different > speed, and each getting a

different

value.

>
And?
The "And?" is obvious to anyone having more than one-eighth of a

brain: > WHICH ONE IS THE "HOLY MEASUREMENT"?
>
In your religion, Harrie - any.
   Duh!
Not good enough, weasel-breath.  YOU are the one with snot on your

face.

YOU are the one dissenting from the confirmed standpoint.  YOU are

the one

that brought up your "holy measurement" stupidity.  Now put up or

shut up.

 

How about - command some glowing worms, Harrie,
poor halfbrain?

 Poor eighth-brain.
 

Once again, I'm talking to an idiot,
Then you're talking to yourself, weasel-breath.

so no surprise I have to repeat some times.

Can you, or can  poor idiot Tom - provide
many examples of things that are not physical
but are physically measured?
I did

>
How many?

 So poor eighth-brain can't count for himself?
 Sorry, pipsqueak, you don't get to command a performance
from people of note.
 "Poor eighth-brain is trying to obscure the whole situation once again.  He pretends there is only one "Holy measurement" but the

But the relativistic idiot is lying impudently,
as expected from a relativistic idiot.

fact is that there are many who can be making the measurement,
each traveling at a different speed, and each getting a different
value."
 Count 'em up, creep.  How many different speeds are there between

Once again, I'm talking to an idiot,
so no surprise I have to repeat some times.
Can you, or can  poor idiot Tom - provide
many EXAMPLES OF THINGS THAT ARE NOT PHYSICAL,
BUT ARE MEASURED PHYSICALLY?

zero and c?  Then double it because there are just as many between
zero and -c.
 

Anyone can check, GPS staff didn't repeat
your mad assumptions and its clocks keep
measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks
always did.

Wozzie-stupe just repeats his stupidity instead

of answering the question.  He is not only stupid,
but fatally corrupt.  And he lies by omission
every time he posts his foolish GPS insanity.

 

Your lies, insult and slanders change nothing,
poor fanatic trash. Your utterly idiotic concept
of time and clocks doesn't and won't work. You
even admit it yourself sometimes

 Says the liar, insulter and slanderer :-))
 who is also stupider than a fence post.
 

Your lies, insult and slanders change nothing,
poor fanatic trash. Your utterly idiotic concept
of time and clocks doesn't and won't work. You
even admit it yourself sometimes