Re: SpaceTime

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: SpaceTime
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 03. Jun 2024, 02:36:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <dadccf954fe67a83138cda60f2abfbe3@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Richard Hachel wrote:
>
Le 03/06/2024 à 01:22, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
>
 One theoretical problem for tachyons is the purported possibility
that
they cause violations of causality.
>
 Physicists pose two problems, that of ignorance and that of arrogance.
Dr. Hachel represents those problems, too.

They pose the problem of ignorance, because they do not understand at
all the notion of anisochrony, which alone explains the practical impossibility of exceeding the speed of light.
Dr. Hachel is exemplifying his arrogance, pretending that he is God.

It's as absurd as looking for round squares and dehydrated waters.
And blatherating about irrelevant analogies.

I repeat, it's not that it's technologically impossible, it's that it's
 absurd.
“In order to attain the impossible, one must attempt the absurd.”
– Miguel de Cervantes
 “The most absurd and reckless aspirations have sometimes led to
extraordinary success.” -- Luc de Clapiers
“If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.”
-- Albert Einstein
So certain is Dr. Hachel of his pronouncement from Olympus :-)
"Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. --
Voltaire

This would amount to assuming a speed faster than an infinitely fast
speed (if we correctly understand this notion which I already explained in 1986).
Nope.  Consider synchronized clocks at x = 0 (t1) and x = L (t2).  A
pulse of particles passes x = 0 at t1 = 0 and passes t2 at time t2.
If t2 - t1 = L/c, then the particles are traveling at the speed of
light.  If t2 - t1 = 0, then the particles are traveling infinitely
fast.  Since t2 - t1 =0 is less than t2 - t1 = L/c, Dr. Hachel's
assertion is refuted.

They pose the problem of arrogance becouse they insult instead of thinking.

R.H.
I'm afraid Dr. Hachel is guilty of not thinking correctly.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 May 24 * Re: SpaceTime60Thomas Heger
31 May 24 +* Re: SpaceTime58Tom Roberts
31 May 24 i+- Re: SpaceTime1Thomas Heger
1 Jun 24 i+* Re: SpaceTime47gharnagel
1 Jun 24 ii+- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 ii`* Re: SpaceTime45Thomas Heger
2 Jun 24 ii `* Re: SpaceTime44gharnagel
2 Jun 24 ii  +* Re: SpaceTime42Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 ii  i`* Re: SpaceTime41gharnagel
2 Jun 24 ii  i +- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 ii  i `* Re: SpaceTime39Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 ii  i  +* Re: SpaceTime34gharnagel
2 Jun 24 ii  i  i+* Re: SpaceTime2Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  ii`- Re: SpaceTime1Thomas Heger
2 Jun 24 ii  i  i+- Re: SpaceTime1Dmitriy Makricosta
2 Jun 24 ii  i  i`* Re: SpaceTime30Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i `* Re: SpaceTime29gharnagel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  +* Re: SpaceTime3Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  i `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  +* Re: SpaceTime4Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  i+- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  i `- Re: SpaceTime1Hank Bogdán
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  `* Re: SpaceTime21Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i   +- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i   `* Re: SpaceTime19gharnagel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    +* Re: SpaceTime7Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    i+* Re: SpaceTime5Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    ii`* Re: SpaceTime4Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    ii `* Re: SpaceTime3Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    ii  `* Re: SpaceTime2Ross Finlayson
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i    ii   `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    i`- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
4 Jun 24 ii  i  i    `* Re: SpaceTime11Richard Hachel
4 Jun 24 ii  i  i     `* Re: SpaceTime10Python
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i      +- Re: SpaceTime1Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i      `* Re: SpaceTime8gharnagel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i       +* Re: SpaceTime3Maciej Wozniak
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i       i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i       i `- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i       +- Re: SpaceTime1Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i       `* Re: SpaceTime3Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i        `* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i         `- Re: SpaceTime1gharnagel
2 Jun 24 ii  i  `* Re: SpaceTime4Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 ii  i   `* Re: SpaceTime3Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 ii  i    `* Re: SpaceTime2Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 ii  i     `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 ii  `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
1 Jun 24 i`* Re: SpaceTime9Maciej Wozniak
1 Jun 24 i `* Re: SpaceTime8Ross Finlayson
1 Jun 24 i  `* Re: SpaceTime7Maciej Wozniak
1 Jun 24 i   `* Re: SpaceTime6Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 i    +- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 i    `* Re: SpaceTime4Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 i     `* Re: SpaceTime3Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 i      `* Re: SpaceTime2Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 i       `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
31 May 24 `- Re: SpaceTime1Thomas Heger

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal