Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 02. Jul 2024, 06:36:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17de4ea3785fa057$986$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 02.07.2024 o 01:49, Ross Finlayson pisze:
On 07/01/2024 01:10 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>
Incorrect. Relativity says light is affected twice as much as anything
else going the same speed, that is, twice Newtonian.
>
Relatvity tells us that nothing else is going at the same speed,
>
Jan
>
 Relativity says that SR is local.
 The idea that information cannot go faster than light, basically
has that the light-like is free information itself.
 Yet, light is local, and an extra-local configuration of experiment,
can make it so that in theories where a "guide lode" is arranged
in the middle of two distant bodies, and either distant body
moves, the guide lode moves, because the geodesy is always
current everywhere, which can be detected the image of the
guide lode, before the image of the distant body.
  Everybody knows that in the Solar System, the "System of the World",
that the gradient of the force of gravity points at the source,
not the image. Its constant (constantly current) evaluation of
the geodesy is reflected in the entire geodesy, not as limited
by the light-like, which is just free propagation of information,
of images, or films.
 The geodesy and its governance of GR, is always current.
  Relativity and Quantum Mechanics both need better understanding
of superclassical models of flow and flux and continuum mechanics.
 
And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden by your
bunch of idiots "improper" GPS and TAI  clocks keep measuring
t'=t, just like all serious clocks always did.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Jun 24 * In relativity "s" is for "spin"26LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Jun 24 +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"6LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Jul 24 i`* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"5bertietaylor
2 Jul 24 i +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"2Turkul Julidov Seto
3 Jul 24 i i`- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1bertietaylor
7 Jul 24 i `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"2Volney
7 Jul 24 i  `- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Hassell Bakunov
29 Jun 24 +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Mayker Belgibaev
29 Jun 24 +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"17Mikko
29 Jun 24 i+- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
29 Jun 24 i`* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"15LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Jun 24 i +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Kennedy Barabás Hor
30 Jun 24 i `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"13Mikko
30 Jun 24 i  +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"2J. J. Lodder
1 Jul 24 i  i`- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
1 Jul 24 i  `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"10LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jul 24 i   `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"9J. J. Lodder
2 Jul 24 i    `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"8Ross Finlayson
2 Jul 24 i     +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
2 Jul 24 i     `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"6J. J. Lodder
2 Jul 24 i      `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"5Ross Finlayson
3 Jul 24 i       +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul 24 i       `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"3J. J. Lodder
3 Jul 24 i        `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"2Ross Finlayson
4 Jul 24 i         `- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Ross Finlayson
29 Jun 24 `- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal