Sujet : Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 02. Jul 2024, 21:22:06
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <sKednaFub5b2_Bn7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 07/02/2024 12:35 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On 07/01/2024 01:10 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>
Incorrect. Relativity says light is affected twice as much as anything
else going the same speed, that is, twice Newtonian.
>
Relatvity tells us that nothing else is going at the same speed,
>
Jan
>
>
Relativity says that SR is local.
>
The idea that information cannot go faster than light, basically
has that the light-like is free information itself.
>
Yet, light is local,
>
Where did you pick up that piece of misinformation?
>
Jan
>
Einstein says so, and, "Relativity of Simultaneity is non-local",
and, "SR is local" is something at least I've arrived at since
quite a few years ago.
Einstein defines two different milieus for "Space-Time",
the "spatial" for GR and "spacial" for SR.