Sujet : Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 03. Jul 2024, 06:02:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17de9b5debaefa02$987$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 02.07.2024 o 22:22, Ross Finlayson pisze:
On 07/02/2024 12:35 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On 07/01/2024 01:10 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>
Incorrect. Relativity says light is affected twice as much as anything
else going the same speed, that is, twice Newtonian.
>
Relatvity tells us that nothing else is going at the same speed,
>
Jan
>
>
Relativity says that SR is local.
>
The idea that information cannot go faster than light, basically
has that the light-like is free information itself.
>
Yet, light is local,
>
Where did you pick up that piece of misinformation?
>
Jan
>
Einstein says so, and, "Relativity of Simultaneity is non-local",
and, "SR is local" is something at least I've arrived at since
quite a few years ago.
Einstein defines two different milieus for "Space-Time",
the "spatial" for GR and "spacial" for SR.
The mumble of the idiot was not even
consistent.