Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"

On 07/03/2024 12:03 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>

On 07/02/2024 12:35 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>

On 07/01/2024 01:10 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>

Incorrect. Relativity says light is affected twice as much as
anything
else going the same speed, that is, twice Newtonian.

>
Relatvity tells us that nothing else is going at the same speed,
>
Jan
>

>
Relativity says that SR is local.
>
The idea that information cannot go faster than light, basically
has that the light-like is free information itself.
>
Yet, light is local,

>
Where did you pick up that piece of misinformation?
>
Jan
>

>
Einstein says so, and, "Relativity of Simultaneity is non-local",
and, "SR is local" is something at least I've arrived at since
quite a few years ago.
>
Einstein defines two different milieus for "Space-Time",
the "spatial" for GR and "spacial" for SR.

>
relativity != light,
>
Jan
>

>
It's pretty simple that Einstein combined his theories
of GR and SR into a theory "Relativity", with GR governing
SR not the other way around, and: that the L-principle,
for light's speed constancy, is a precept of SR, and, Relativity.
>
The "no absolute motion" bit, or "Relativity", doesn't address
itself neither the Galilean linear or gyroscopic rotational
space-contraction, the one going out the other in, nor does
it address "absolute space", nor "absolute time".
>
>