Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 15. Jul 2024, 18:01:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <izveVGifGDRSbakah8W7iAULn6o@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 15/07/2024 à 18:12,
hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:55:23 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
"Universal simultaneity" IS Newtonian physics.
Your sentence is false by omission.
Can I take the liberty of correcting it?
You have to say :
"Universal simultaneity IS Newtonian physics and IS Einsteinian physics".
You are, once again, confusing the notion of universal simultaneity (which speaks of moments, of the same present moment) with chronotropy which measures durations, that is to say the speed at which watches beat.
It's not the same thing.
This confusion is surreal. It's like a nine-year-old confusing addition with multiplication. It's not the same concept at all.
R.H.