Re: Relativistic aberration

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 15. Jul 2024, 21:59:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <Rsj9fwaYx7xWTx_LjgnuDLRLG0M@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 15/07/2024 à 22:24, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:08:01 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
As a physicist, I do say that.  But physicists have been wrong before,
so prove
that I'm wrong.
What is interesting about you is that you do not despise, you do not insult, and you seek to understand things.
You also seem to understand my position without saying anything.
My position is this: the theory of relativity is true, at least in some beginnings, but if we carry the ideas to the end, there are things that go wrong, both experimentally, and at the same time ( and above all) theoretically.
Absurdities and contradictions appear in the equations.
Already forty years ago, I noticed that things did not fit, and today, I am strong enough to:
1. Show irrefutably that it does not hold using apparent velocities (what we could see in telescopes).
2. Explain why.
3. Give what I believe to be correct for the whole theory, (including uniformly accelerated frames and rotating frames).
Now, there is no other theoretical explanation in the world that does not hold up except mine, so all the others have no chance of being true. If it is already false on paper, it is necessarily even more false on the ground.
But talking is no use to me, even if I have the theoretical proof.
Experimental proof is needed.
A good experimental proof would consist of testing the validity of:
Voi/c=[1+c²/2ax)]^-(1/2) which gives a much lower instantaneous observable speed, significantly much lower than the instantaneous speeds predicted by physicists during particle accelerations.
It is clear that if we know the acceleration with certainty, the mass of the particle, as well as the energy or momentum of the particle at this instant, we can easily deduce Voi (instantaneous observable speed).
And see that my equation is correct.
Now, I have doubts about the feasibility of the experiment with regard to acceleration: how can I be sure that it is indeed the acceleration of the particle that is taken into account, and not the acceleration measured in the laboratory?
I repeat it tirelessly, SR is very simple, much simpler than we teach it.
But it's full of little traps.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jul 24 * Relativistic aberration213Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration106gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i+* Re: Relativistic aberration3Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 ii`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 ii `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i`* Re: Relativistic aberration102Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i `* Re: Relativistic aberration101gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration100Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration99gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration96Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration95gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration94Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration93gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration91Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration90gharnagel
16 Jul 24 i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration89Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration88gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration87Thomas Heger
17 Jul 24 i        i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration86gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     +* Re: Relativistic aberration78Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24 i        i     i`* Re: Relativistic aberration77gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     i `* Re: Relativistic aberration76Maciej Wozniak
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  +* Re: Relativistic aberration3gharnagel
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  i+- Re: Relativistic aberration1Reign Batura
31 Jul 24 i        i     i  i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration72gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration71Maciej Wozniak
11 Aug 24 i        i     i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration70gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Kalakos Angelopoulos
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration68gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Szűcs Kővári
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration66gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration65gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration5Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration4Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration2gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i   `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        `* Re: Relativistic aberration59Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i         `* Re: Relativistic aberration58gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i          `* Re: Relativistic aberration57Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           +* Re: Relativistic aberration4Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i`* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i  `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           `* Re: Relativistic aberration52gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i            `* Re: Relativistic aberration51Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             +* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             `* Re: Relativistic aberration47gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              +* Re: Relativistic aberration43Maciej Wozniak
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i`* Re: Relativistic aberration42gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i +* Re: Relativistic aberration40Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i+* Re: Relativistic aberration13Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii+* Re: Relativistic aberration11Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii`* Re: Relativistic aberration10Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii `* Re: Relativistic aberration9Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii  `* Re: Relativistic aberration8Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   `* Re: Relativistic aberration6Javis Orbán
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii    `* Re: Relativistic aberration5Thomas Heger
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     +* Re: Relativistic aberration2Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Balabaanoff Bibitinsky
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Mozhar Bairamkulov
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i`* Re: Relativistic aberration26gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i `* Re: Relativistic aberration25Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration24gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration23Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration22gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration21Richard Hachel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration5gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i+* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration13Paul.B.Andersen
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration12Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `* His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...11JC_Lavau
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  +* "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts8Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i+* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  ii`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i`* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts5Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i `* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts4Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  +* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  i`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  `- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  +- Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  `- Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Josh Vassilopulos
12 Aug 24 i        i     i               `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i                `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Pete Beaulieu
18 Jul 24 i        i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration7Thomas Heger
18 Jul 24 i        i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration6gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i        `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
31 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration69Sylvia Else
7 Aug 24 `* Re: Relativistic aberration37JanPB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal