Re: tau egality in relalivity

W dniu 20.07.2024 o 16:28, Python pisze:

Le 20/07/2024 à 16:25, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 20.07.2024 o 16:14, Python pisze:

Le 20/07/2024 à 16:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 20.07.2024 o 16:01, Python pisze:

Le 20/07/2024 à 00:47, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :

Le 20/07/2024 à 00:08, Python a écrit :

>
As usual you've snipped my argument and do not even try to
address it (because you know that you can, I'd guess)
>

If two travelers leave at the same time, and arrive at the same time, it goes without saying that the improper times will be equal. This is the very definition of logical thinking.

>
Using as a condition something that is always true is definitely NOT
a logical way of thinking.
>

[snip repetition of the same babbling]

>
>

You refute violently because you have read Einstein and Minkowski.

>
I'm not using anything from SR, Einstein or Minkowski in my
argument.

>
>

BTW, read what Poincare wrote about non
euclidean geometries in "science  and
hypothesis"

>
I did. We've already talked about that. Your point is wrong.

>
Well, that's [snip profanities] lie, but
nothing [snip whining]

 https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/09w_O2XOEik/m/IloTCV6JEgAJ
 So no, it is not a lie.

Of course it is, and a very stinky one.
And completely idiotic, as well.
The alternatives considered by P were:
"we could give up Euclidean geometry,
or modify the laws of optics, and suppose that
light is not rigorously propagated in a straight line."
Trying to pretend that the choice of your idiot
guru was NOT "give up EG" - is, well, even worse
than your usual level.