Sujet : Re: tau egality in relalivity
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 21. Jul 2024, 04:59:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17e41e6343563ee1$81417$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 21.07.2024 o 00:22, Python pisze:
Le 21/07/2024 à 00:05, Richard Hachel a écrit :
Le 20/07/2024 à 22:34, Python a écrit :
>
Cranks of your kind LOVES ambiguity.
>
Sniffff...
>
What you just said is very mean, snifff...
>
All my life, I have hated ambiguities and abstract terms, especially if they are used to deceive men, sniffff...
This is actually quite interesting how you swiped from an expression
Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
tau egality in relalivity
Re: tau egality in relalivity