Re: Incorrect mathematical integration

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Incorrect mathematical integration
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 22. Jul 2024, 20:34:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v7mc8d$pmhs$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 21.07.2024 23:06, skrev Richard Hachel:
Le 21/07/2024 à 21:26, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
Den 20.07.2024 23:55, skrev Richard Hachel:
 
So: in an inertial system K, a clock C is in inertial motion.
>
t is the time in K.
Per DEFINITION of MY scenario.
Don't insist on putting your indexes on MY coordinates!

 
A and B are two stationary, synchronous clocks in K.
>
At t = t₁
  C
  A                     B
--|---------------------|------> x
  0                     L
Clock A is showing t₁, clock C is adjacent to A and is set to zero.
At t = t₂
                         C
   A                     B
--|---------------------|------> x
   0                     L
Clock B is showing t₂, clock C is adjacent to B and is showing τ
Let L = 0.0001 light second = 29979 m
Let (t₂ - t₁) = T = 125 μs
v = L/T = 239833966.4 m/s = 0.8c
w = L/τ
What kind of time is T ?
 T=To (observable time in the laboratory, time observable but not real mesured by two anisochronic clocks A and B).
The clocks are synchronous per definition!
T is obviously the time measured in the in the inertial system.
Of course the time T = 125 μs is a real time.
Look.
All clocks in France show the time GMT+2 hours.
If you travel from Paris when a clock in Paris show 12.00
and you arrive at Nice (distance 937 km) when a clock in
Nice shows 22.00, then the duration of your journey is T = 10 h.
What do you mean with your claim that these 10 hours aren't real?
Does it mean that the 10 hours are imaginary? Are you dreaming them?

 
What kind of speed is v ?
 Observable speed Vo.
Which is not a real speed?
The speed v = 0.8c is the speed measured in the inertial system.
Of course it is a real speed.
Your speed from Paris to Nice, measured to 93.7 km/h
is  a real speed.
You claim that the speed of your car relative to the ground
is not a real speed! Good grief!

What is τ ? (equation, value and type of time)
 Proper time of C (real time).
Quite.
τ = T/γ = 75 μs
It is the time shown on clock C when it is adjacent to clock B.
Of course it is a real time.

What kind of speed is w ?
 Real speed (Vr)
w = L/τ = 399723277 m/s = (4/3)c
This is the "proper velocity".
But is it "a real speed"?

 
What is the physical significance of w?
It is simply a distance in an inertial system divided
with the proper time of a clock to travel the distance.
It is a speed, but not the speed of a physical object relative
to another physical object.
Clock C is moving with the speed v relative to clock A and B,
and clock A and B are moving with the speed v relative to clock C.
The notion "proper" used on a frame dependent entity
is problematic because "proper entities" are usually
invariant (proper time, proper length).
I have seen "proper velocity" defined in only one book:
J.H. Smith "Introduction to Special Relativity" from 1965.
It was the first (non popular) book I read about SR.
But it isn't mentioned in more modern books such as:
Carrol:           Spacetime geometry,
Taylor & Wheeler: Spacetime physics
D'Inverno:        Introduction to Einstein's relativity
Misner, Thorne and Wheeler: Gravitation
BUT this "proper velocity" is the spatial component of
the four-velocity.
(Which is very different from the three velocity.)

   Vr=AB/τ
 It is a physical notion, but not very important in Galilean relativistic physics, on the other hand, which becomes fundamental in the physics of accelerated mobiles and which we can no longer do without as soon as we leave basic relativistic physics.
"Galilean relativistic physics"! Good grief. :-D
The "proper velocity" is never used in SR.

 I recognize that it is quite strange to say that it is in the laboratory that we measure the real distance traveled, and at the level of the particle that we measure the real time to travel it.
It isn't only strange, it is nonsensical.

 
Can it say anything about the position of C at the time τ ?
 x = Vo.To = Vr.Tr = Vapp.Tapp
 x=Vr.τ
x = (L/τ)⋅τ = L
Very useful equation indeed :-D
-----------------
Let's look at the LHC again.
The length of the circuit is L = 27 k, γ = 7460
The real speed of the proton in the lab frame is
v = 0.999999991·c
The real time measured in the lab frame for the proton to go
around the circuit is
  T = L/v ≈ 90 μs
The proper time of a proton to go around the circuit is
  τ = T/γ ≈ 12 ns
"proper speed" = L/τ = 6947c
This "speed" is not the speed of a proton or anything else.
The proton is moving at the speed 0.999999991·c relative to the lab,
and the lab is moving at the speed 0.999999991·c relative to the proton.
And you thought that the real speed speed of the proton in the lab frame
was 6947c and therefore you "tell them [the physicists at CERN]  that
the proton rotates 78 million times per second".
Which is 6933 times the real number,  ≈ 11.25 thousand times per second.
But you are too stupid to understand that your nonsense is just that.
Right? :-D
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Jul 24 * Incorrect mathematical integration99Richard Hachel
19 Jul 24 +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration11gharnagel
19 Jul 24 i+- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 i+* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration8Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 ii`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration7gharnagel
20 Jul 24 ii +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Willliam Zdunowski
20 Jul 24 ii `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration5Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 ii  `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4gharnagel
20 Jul 24 ii   +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Python
20 Jul 24 ii   `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 ii    `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1gharnagel
20 Jul 24 i`- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24 +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Mikko
20 Jul 24 i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Stefan Ram
20 Jul 24 i `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24 `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration84Paul.B.Andersen
20 Jul 24  +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24  `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration82Richard Hachel
21 Jul 24   `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration81Paul.B.Andersen
21 Jul 24    +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration13Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24    i+- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Mikko
22 Jul 24    i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration11Paul.B.Andersen
22 Jul 24    i +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2gharnagel
23 Jul 24    i i`- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24    i +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24    i +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24    i +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration5Richard Hachel
23 Jul 24    i i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4Paul.B.Andersen
23 Jul 24    i i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Richard Hachel
23 Jul 24    i i  +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Darren Kalishewsky Tong
24 Jul 24    i i  `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Paul.B.Andersen
23 Jul 24    i `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Dawn Oborotov
21 Jul 24    +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Richard Hachel
21 Jul 24    i`- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
21 Jul 24    `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration65Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24     +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Ronnal Baikovski
22 Jul 24     `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration63Paul.B.Andersen
22 Jul 24      +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24      +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24      +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24      +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
22 Jul 24      `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration58Richard Hachel
23 Jul 24       `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration57Paul.B.Andersen
24 Jul 24        +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24        +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24        +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Brendan Grammatakakis
24 Jul 24        +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24        `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration52Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24         `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration51Paul.B.Andersen
24 Jul 24          +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration35Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24          i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration34Paul.B.Andersen
24 Jul 24          i +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration24Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24          i i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration23Paul.B.Andersen
24 Jul 24          i i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration22Richard Hachel
25 Jul 24          i i  `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration21Paul.B.Andersen
25 Jul 24          i i   +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration19Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24          i i   i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration18Paul.B.Andersen
26 Jul 24          i i   i +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4Python
26 Jul 24          i i   i i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Maciej Wozniak
26 Jul 24          i i   i i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Python
26 Jul 24          i i   i i  `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
26 Jul 24          i i   i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration13Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24          i i   i  `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration12Paul.B.Andersen
26 Jul 24          i i   i   +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Richard Hachel
27 Jul 24          i i   i   i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Thomas Heger
27 Jul 24          i i   i   i `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Stanton Paraskevopoulos
26 Jul 24          i i   i   +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Richard Hachel
27 Jul 24          i i   i   i`- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Trejo Belmonte
26 Jul 24          i i   i   +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24          i i   i   `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration5Richard Hachel
27 Jul 24          i i   i    `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4Paul.B.Andersen
27 Jul 24          i i   i     +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Mordechai De la fontaine
27 Jul 24          i i   i     `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Maciej Wozniak
27 Jul 24          i i   i      `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Millard Czajkowski
27 Jul 24          i i   `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Keaton Bodó
24 Jul 24          i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration9Python
24 Jul 24          i  +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration7Maciej Wozniak
24 Jul 24          i  i+* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4Python
24 Jul 24          i  ii`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Maciej Wozniak
24 Jul 24          i  ii `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Python
25 Jul 24          i  ii  `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
25 Jul 24          i  i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Richard Hachel
25 Jul 24          i  i `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Maciej Wozniak
24 Jul 24          i  `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Delbert Baram
24 Jul 24          +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2Maciej Wozniak
24 Jul 24          i`- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
25 Jul 24          `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration13Ross Finlayson
25 Jul 24           `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration12Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24            +* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration5gharnagel
26 Jul 24            i+- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24            i`* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24            i `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration2gharnagel
28 Jul 24            i  `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Clancy De santigo
26 Jul 24            `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration6Ross Finlayson
26 Jul 24             `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration5Richard Hachel
27 Jul 24              `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration4Ross Finlayson
27 Jul 24               `* Re: Incorrect mathematical integration3Ross Finlayson
27 Jul 24                +- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Sixto Shibanuma
28 Jul 24                `- Re: Incorrect mathematical integration1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal