Sujet : Re: Incorrect mathematical integration
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 24. Jul 2024, 20:05:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <xsofvzKe9L78tK72SM_rWx-vKBE@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 24/07/2024 à 16:30, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
Your idiot guru Roberts could explain you that
"measured" doesn't necessarily mean "real"
in the liturgy of your moronic church.
Measured does not necessarily mean real.
Let's take the measure of the shadow of this building. This is a real measurement, I measure with a real meter, and on real ground.
But is this the actual measurement of the building?
The same is true in relativity, when I measure in an anisochronous medium, how our universe is made.
No matter how much we jump like a kid and say: "there is no anisochrony, anisochrony does not exist", it changes nothing, and it advances nothing.
I do measure time, but with out-of-synchronization watches, and the speed I think I measure is not the real speed.
I recall the two simple and reciprocal equations:
Vr=Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
Vo=Vr/sqrt(1+Vr²/c²)
R.H.