Re: Incorrect mathematical integration

Le 24/07/2024 à 22:41, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

 We are dealing on fr.sci.* with this idiot for thirty years, go figure!

  And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).

It is not useful to advise poor stinker Python. He doesn't understand anything at all.
It's even very surprising.
I tried for decades to explain to him why Poincaré was a genius, and Einstein a common copyist; why Poincaré's transformations were correct, but not what Minkoski did with them; why I am the only one to have really given a theory of special relativity of absolute perfection far from the wanderings of relativistic physicists (you just have to study and check if I have made a single mathematical or conceptual theoretical error ), etc... But he doesn't care...
The only thing he cares about is posting to show that he is the greatest physicist in the world, and that he is going to massacre everyone.
Except that he is absolutely zero in SR as soon as we go beyond the space-time invariance of his God Minkowski.
R.H.