Sujet : Re: Incorrect mathematical integration
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 26. Jul 2024, 21:29:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <-TlqoXvHYNmOxcLTfCR8QRNL0_g@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 26/07/2024 à 21:54, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
Den 26.07.2024 18:14, skrev Richard Hachel:
How do you think that the proton can have two different speeds
in the laboratory frame?
Of course it can't in the real world.
We must say simple things, and we must say true things.
It is very difficult in special relativity because of the frequent conceptual errors. Sometimes when I read certain things here or elsewhere, I have the impression that everything is sinking into horror.
We must be careful about the confusion of words.
You say, a body can only have one speed, and you seem to think that I am an idiot.
But no, I am not an idiot, and it is precisely because of morons like Python that I can pass for an idiot.
Do you think that I am so stupid to say that a moving body can have two different speeds at the same time?
When I say that a body can have, in the same frame of reference, many different speeds, that is OBVIOUSLY not what I am talking about.
Let us assume a speed Vo=0.8c.
It is quite obvious that I cannot have at the same time, at the risk of being absurd, I who claim to describe the most beautiful, the simplest and the most logical theory, a life that is Vo=0.8/c, Vo=0.9c, Vo=0.5c and Vo=0.999c.
It would be absurd, and it would be dishonest to make me say what I did not say.
Now, I can still write Vo=0.8c, Vr=(4/3)c, Vapp'=0.4444c and Vapp"=4c.
You just have to understand what I write, why I write it, and validate it without spitting on it.
R.H.