Sujet : Re: Energy?
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 31. Jul 2024, 21:37:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17e766a84852fb85$86725$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 31.07.2024 o 21:02, J. J. Lodder pisze:
gharnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 8:30:15 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 31.07.2024 o 10:02, J. J. Lodder pisze:
>
A somewhat jocular, but practical working proper definition is:
Energy is 1/2 m v^2, and everything else that is missing from the law
of
conservation of energy.
>
And thus - conservation of energy, your alleged
"law of nature" is really a simple language truism
(and it's not a critique, just stating the fact).
>
So Wozzie doesn't believe energy conservation is a
law? Maybe he has noticed that his own energy gone
down the toilet?
Yes, a complete lack of understanding of what it is all about,
in his case.
You may use the law of conservation of energy
to discover new and as yet unknown forms of energy.
Tell me, poor halfbrain - do you think
your so called "law" is "falsifiable" with
the definition above?
Energy?
Re: Energy?
