Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 01. Aug 2024, 17:34:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <Hkk1Se5bNU9p7__xNLSQZT3JNgE@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 01/08/2024 à 15:33, Python a écrit :
So yes, your "theory" is "void", completely absurd stupid "void".
My "theory" is no more stupid than the theory of universal gravitation.
What does the theory of universal gravitation say?
That bodies attract each other according to the equation F = -Gmm'/r2 where F is the gravitational constant.
What does the theory of universal anisochrony say?
That the notion of absolute simultaneity (of the universal present moment) is an abstract entity, and that the adjustment of watches can only be done each time in relation to a single watch, imaginary or not.
I have known much more absurd propositions.
R.H.