Re: Relativistic aberration

On 2024-07-31 15:10:08 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

Le 31/07/2024 à 07:03, Python a écrit :

 Oh, anything build later is bad, "abstract" (the same word Hachel uses
when he cease to believe he understand something), as an "information
engineer" you have issues with abstractions too?
 It looks to any sane person (neither you nor Hachel) can recognize that
from Newtonian physics to Relativity and Quantum Mechanics just ran fine
anyway :-)

 I'm not sure that everything went so well.
 It started with the equations of H.A. Lorentz, real complex and wrong blocks to find the right transformations.
 If Poincaré, the greatest mathematician in the world in 1905, who was not Breton, HIM, had not helped him, he would still be there.
 When the RR came out, 100 scientists proposed a manifesto, arguing that it was not all clear, and that there was obvious bullshit, and poorly explained.

The "poorly explained" part is true to some extent, as can be seen when
comparing to the best modern explanations.
--
Mikko