Re: Relativistic aberration

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 04. Aug 2024, 13:57:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17e887d977272153$96453$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 04.08.2024 o 14:50, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
Den 03.08.2024 23:40, skrev Richard Hachel:
Le 03/08/2024 à 22:28, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>
E(x,y,z,t) = (12000 ly, 9000 ly, 0 ly, -15000.0 y)
t is when the light left the telescope, now = 0 y
>
Let us assume that, in accordance with convention,
the x-axis is pointing toward the vernal point Epoch J200,
and the x-y plane is the ecliptic plane. The z-axis will
then point toward the ecliptic north pole.
>
The RA is then arctan(9000/12000) = 37⁰
The DEC = 0⁰
The distance d =  √(x² + y² + z²) = 15000 ly
>
Since the rocket is moving along the x-axis'
the angle velocity - (direction to star) = 37⁰,
the RA in the rocket frame will due to aberration be 12.7⁰
the DEC = 0.
Since the rocket and the Earth are colocated at the time of reception,
they will obviously receive the same light which was emitted from
the star 15000 years ago.
That means that the distance in the Rocket frame must be 15000 ly.
>
Simple geometry will give:
x' = 15000⋅cos(12.7⁰) ly = 14633 ly
y' = 15000⋅sin(12.7⁰) ly =  3297 ly
z' = 0 ly
t' = -15000/c year = -15000 year
>
E '= (14633 ly, 3297 ly, 0 ly, -15000 y)
>
? ? ?
<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?n6nnyNLQR1tXDC_uShX3k3bxE5g@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>
>
But what are you talking about? ? ?
>
You're talking nonsense!!!
>
Your thing IS nonsense!
>
How do you want the object to be at the same distance in both frames of reference? ? ?
 This is about what the observers SEE in their telescopes.
 They are co-located when they receive the light from the supernova,
so they obviously both see the star as it goes supernova.
 Since earth observers have _measured_ (via parallax ?) the distance
to the star to be 15000 ly, and the speed of light is c in the
Earth frame, the earth observer can deduce that the light must
have left the star 15000 years ago.
Again common sense prejudices, refuted by your
idiot gurus with their "inflation" "discovery".
Your poor halfbrain is still polluted with them,
they didn't brainwash you enough.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jul 24 * Relativistic aberration213Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration106gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i+* Re: Relativistic aberration3Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 ii`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 ii `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i`* Re: Relativistic aberration102Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i `* Re: Relativistic aberration101gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration100Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration99gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration96Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration95gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration94Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration93gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration91Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration90gharnagel
16 Jul 24 i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration89Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration88gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration87Thomas Heger
17 Jul 24 i        i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration86gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     +* Re: Relativistic aberration78Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24 i        i     i`* Re: Relativistic aberration77gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     i `* Re: Relativistic aberration76Maciej Wozniak
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  +* Re: Relativistic aberration3gharnagel
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  i+- Re: Relativistic aberration1Reign Batura
31 Jul 24 i        i     i  i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration72gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration71Maciej Wozniak
11 Aug 24 i        i     i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration70gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Kalakos Angelopoulos
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration68gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Szűcs Kővári
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration66gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration65gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration5Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration4Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration2gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i   `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        `* Re: Relativistic aberration59Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i         `* Re: Relativistic aberration58gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i          `* Re: Relativistic aberration57Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           +* Re: Relativistic aberration4Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i`* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i  `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           `* Re: Relativistic aberration52gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i            `* Re: Relativistic aberration51Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             +* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             `* Re: Relativistic aberration47gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              +* Re: Relativistic aberration43Maciej Wozniak
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i`* Re: Relativistic aberration42gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i +* Re: Relativistic aberration40Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i+* Re: Relativistic aberration13Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii+* Re: Relativistic aberration11Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii`* Re: Relativistic aberration10Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii `* Re: Relativistic aberration9Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii  `* Re: Relativistic aberration8Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   `* Re: Relativistic aberration6Javis Orbán
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii    `* Re: Relativistic aberration5Thomas Heger
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     +* Re: Relativistic aberration2Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Balabaanoff Bibitinsky
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Mozhar Bairamkulov
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i`* Re: Relativistic aberration26gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i `* Re: Relativistic aberration25Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration24gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration23Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration22gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration21Richard Hachel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration5gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i+* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration13Paul.B.Andersen
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration12Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `* His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...11JC_Lavau
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  +* "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts8Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i+* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  ii`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i`* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts5Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i `* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts4Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  +* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  i`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  `- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  +- Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  `- Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Josh Vassilopulos
12 Aug 24 i        i     i               `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i                `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Pete Beaulieu
18 Jul 24 i        i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration7Thomas Heger
18 Jul 24 i        i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration6gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i        `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
31 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration69Sylvia Else
7 Aug 24 `* Re: Relativistic aberration37JanPB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal