Re: The physics of [SR] still inconsistent

Le 07/08/2024 à 12:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic [physicists] -
wasn't valid in the time when [Albert Einstein]
lived and [published]. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
  Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.

If the observer brings his own co-moving copy of the Solar System he
will notice that the rotation time of his own copy of Earth won't match
the rotation time of the original Earth.

And [similarly] with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.

Same. He will notice that the length of a meridian won't change on his
own copy of Earth while it will be shorter on the original Earth.
Case closed: SR is consistent.