Re: The physics of [SR] still inconsistent

Python <python@invalid.org> wrote:

Le 07/08/2024 à 12:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic [physicists] -
wasn't valid in the time when [Albert Einstein]
lived and [published]. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
 
 
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.

 
If the observer brings his own co-moving copy of the Solar System he
will notice that the rotation time of his own copy of Earth won't match
the rotation time of the original Earth.
 

And [similarly] with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.

 
Same. He will notice that the length of a meridian won't change on his
own copy of Earth while it will be shorter on the original Earth.
 
Case closed: SR is consistent.

And GR too. If he is just sitting still wrt to the solar system,
but far out beyond Pluto, he will notice that his clocks run at TCB,
(barycentric coordinate time)
which differs from TAI by about half a second per year,

Jan