Re: Relativistic aberration

Le 08/08/2024 à 17:37, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 08.08.2024 o 17:25, Python pisze:

Le 08/08/2024 à 17:23, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 08.08.2024 o 17:12, Python pisze:

Le 08/08/2024 à 17:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 08.08.2024 o 16:56, Python pisze:

Le 08/08/2024 à 16:52,  Richard Hachel   a écrit :

Le 08/08/2024 à 13:17, Python a écrit :

Le 08/08/2024 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit :

>

Poincare's idea was further developed by Hermann Minkowski.

>
This is true.

>
No, it's true.

>
"no" then "it's true"?
>

When Henri Poincaré (blessed be he and honored be his holy memory before the divine Word) wrote his transformations, he gave one of the most beautiful mathematical poems in the universe.
These transformations that Lorentz searched for years without ever finding them are admirable.
Now, we must interpret this PHYSICALLY.
It is not by jumping like a kid like Python, shouting: "Poincaré is beautiful, Poincaré is brilliant, Poincaré was a God in mathematics" that we will get there.

>
As if you had the mathematical competence to understand Poincaré! You

>
>
>
Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you,

>
:-D :-D :-D :-P
>

It's you who has no competence to understand
P. You've demonstrated it very well.

>
Sure. Fancy to teach math in my seat in a few schools in France?

>
Tried some times - hopeless.

>
You tried to teach? And failed? Surprising. What happened?

 You're too dumb.

Who is "you"? I don't remember following your class.