Re: Relativistic aberration

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 12. Aug 2024, 05:33:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17eae0fc5eb2eec9$255290$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 11.08.2024 o 22:19, gharnagel pisze:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 18:07:25 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 11.08.2024 o 19:49, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 15:25:05 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
Exactly, trash. Those alleged clocks having readings
as your idiot guru porophecied - exist only in
sick delusions of yours and your fellow idiots.
>
Clocks are human inventions, so smart humans will set
them to agree with natural phenomena.
>
Sorry, trash, they won't.
 Denigration and prevarication aren't valid arguments.
 
Anyone can check GPS - oppositely, they will set them
to ignore natutral phenomena.
 Wozniak asserts that "t' = t" in the GPS system, but he
Harrie asserts t'<>t, but when asked
what t' is then - he's only spitting,
insulting and slandering.
Let's try again: so, when t(time indicated
by a ground base clock) is 2024-08-31
17:00:00.00000000 - t' (time indicated by
a satellite clock) will be? Consider the
simultaneity of the base.
Lies have short legs.

never defines his terms.
A lie, of course, as expected from a relativistic
doggie in general and from Harrie especially.
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 3:45:25 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
 > Easy one, Harrie. t is indication of one clock (Earth)
 > t' is the indication of the other (GPS satellite).
 > And they are equal, against the moronic prophecies
 > of your idiot guru; that's why you're trying to
 > delete one of them from the reality.
And poor lying piece of shit Harrie did surely
notice that because it has answerred.

Fortunetely for your bunch of idiots  you're
not THAT stupid. You only insist they should
be set to agree with your fantasies, but you're
setting them ordinary way so they indicate
t'=t, like always, and those alleged clocks
"agreeing with natural phenomena" and
"confirming" your idiocies - exist only in
your sick delusions.
 Sorry to say, but Wozniak appears to be the one with
"sick delusions" since motional and gravitational
time dilation are confirmed phenomena which would
And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden by
your bunch of idiots "improper" clocks keep measuring
t'=t, just like all serious clocks always did.
Nobody sane is going to set clocks to agree with
your alleged "natural phenomena", and even the
hardest Shit fanatics are not really THAT stupid.
They only pretend.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jul 24 * Relativistic aberration213Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration106gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i+* Re: Relativistic aberration3Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 ii`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 ii `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i`* Re: Relativistic aberration102Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i `* Re: Relativistic aberration101gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration100Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration99gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration96Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration95gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration94Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration93gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration91Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration90gharnagel
16 Jul 24 i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration89Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration88gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration87Thomas Heger
17 Jul 24 i        i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration86gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     +* Re: Relativistic aberration78Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24 i        i     i`* Re: Relativistic aberration77gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     i `* Re: Relativistic aberration76Maciej Wozniak
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  +* Re: Relativistic aberration3gharnagel
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  i+- Re: Relativistic aberration1Reign Batura
31 Jul 24 i        i     i  i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration72gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration71Maciej Wozniak
11 Aug 24 i        i     i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration70gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Kalakos Angelopoulos
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration68gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Szűcs Kővári
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration66gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration65gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration5Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration4Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration2gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i   `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        `* Re: Relativistic aberration59Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i         `* Re: Relativistic aberration58gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i          `* Re: Relativistic aberration57Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           +* Re: Relativistic aberration4Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i`* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i  `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           `* Re: Relativistic aberration52gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i            `* Re: Relativistic aberration51Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             +* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             `* Re: Relativistic aberration47gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              +* Re: Relativistic aberration43Maciej Wozniak
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i`* Re: Relativistic aberration42gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i +* Re: Relativistic aberration40Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i+* Re: Relativistic aberration13Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii+* Re: Relativistic aberration11Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii`* Re: Relativistic aberration10Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii `* Re: Relativistic aberration9Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii  `* Re: Relativistic aberration8Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   `* Re: Relativistic aberration6Javis Orbán
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii    `* Re: Relativistic aberration5Thomas Heger
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     +* Re: Relativistic aberration2Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Balabaanoff Bibitinsky
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Mozhar Bairamkulov
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i`* Re: Relativistic aberration26gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i `* Re: Relativistic aberration25Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration24gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration23Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration22gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration21Richard Hachel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration5gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i+* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration13Paul.B.Andersen
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration12Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `* His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...11JC_Lavau
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  +* "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts8Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i+* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  ii`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i`* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts5Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i `* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts4Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  +* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  i`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  `- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  +- Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  `- Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Josh Vassilopulos
12 Aug 24 i        i     i               `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i                `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Pete Beaulieu
18 Jul 24 i        i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration7Thomas Heger
18 Jul 24 i        i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration6gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i        `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
31 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration69Sylvia Else
7 Aug 24 `* Re: Relativistic aberration37JanPB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal