Sujet : Re: Space-time interval (2)
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 14. Aug 2024, 20:24:44
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <KRSdncr8gL_lmSD7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 08/14/2024 12:20 PM, gharnagel wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:29:51 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 14.08.2024 o 20:11, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:37:09 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>
Le 14/08/2024 à 16:39, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
>
Actually, time passes MORE quickly at the satellite.
"Chronotropy" is
a canard. The rate of the satellite clock is set to run slow so
that
it is observed to run at the proper rate on the earth. The reason
why
the satellite must be updated is because (1) the satellite is not
in
an exactly circular orbit and (2) the earth does not have a
uniform
density.
>
Someone (I'm not naming any names) needs to do some studying.
>
This is a very interesting post.
It asks a question: "How is it that the satellite, which apparently
goes
faster than the earth, has a time that passes faster, contrary to
what
SR predicts?"
>
Because, of course, it's GR.
>
We answer it as we can, today, the answer is that it seems that
apparently, gravitation slows down time.
>
It's not just "apparent": it's confirmed by experiment.
>
Bullshit,
>
Yes, that describes what Wozniak does very well.
>
anyone can check - time (as defined by your idiot guru himself)
>
Ah, Wozniak proves once again that HE is the one who slanders and
insults.
>
is galilean, with the precision of an acceptable error.
>
Refuted by copious experimental evidence:
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#Experimental_testing_3
>
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/einsteins-time-dilation-prediction-verified/
>
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_testing_of_time_dilation#Experiments
>
>
Only liars or fools protest this factual evidence.
>
Your bunch of idiots
>
Wozniak proves once again that HE is the one who slanders and insults.
>
is trying to lie that the indications of clocks ere not equal,
>
No one is saying the indications aren't equal. Wozniak is wrong about
that.
>
but asking you what they are then - results
only in insults and slanders. Lies have
short legs, poor trash.
>
No insults, slanders or lies on this side of the table. Wozniak is
projecting
again. His posts have the shortest legs of all.
SLAC track cracked way back -> space-contraction is what's real,
and it looks Galilean that way linearly.
Space-time interval (2)
Re: Space-time interval (2)