Re: Space-time interval (2)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Space-time interval (2)
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 14. Aug 2024, 21:04:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17ebb0fa82902697$331356$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 14.08.2024 o 21:53, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
Den 14.08.2024 00:42, skrev Richard Hachel:
>
I just explained to you the synchronization used by GPS.
 You have no idea of how the GPS SV-clocks are kept synchronous.
 
Abstract synchronization, but interesting to be able to use a universal present time plan (which does not exist in nature).
 Quite.
The "universal present time plan", namely
the "Coordinated Universal Time" or "Temps Universel Coordonné",
short UTC (not CUT or TUC - a compromise)
is indeed a theoretical time defined by humans.
("It does not exist in nature", Good grief! :-D)
 That it is coordinated simply means that UTC is the same at any point
in the non rotating Earth centred frame of reference (ECI-frame).
UTC's rate is defined by stationary clocks (as defined by SI) on
the geoid. UTC is 12.00 when the mean sun is in the meridian
at Greenwich.
 You seem to think that what you call "a universal present time plan"
has something to do with GPS. But UTC was created January 1, 1960,
before the GPS.
 The UTC was nothing new, before that was Greenwich Mean Time, GMT.
GMT was the time shown by the pendulum clock at Greenwich,
which was kept in sync with the mean solar day, and the second
was defined by the mean solar day.
The GMT was used from the 19th century. The word "coordinated"
was not used, but at the time of Newton's absolute time, everyone
thought it obvious that GMT was the same everywhere.
 The only way to navigate across the oceans at that time (and until
recently) was by celestial navigation. That is, by measuring the angular
height of a celestial body, usually the sun, with a sextant, and
via tables (made by the British Admiralty) and the time determine
the position. And the time in the tables is GMT. So the navigator
had to have a clock synchronous with GMT. Since the sun moves
1 minute of arc in 15 seconds, an error of 15 seconds from GMT
will give an error of 1 minute of arc on the Earth, which is one nautical mile. If the clock was 1 minute off GMT, the error would
be 4 nautical miles, which would be acceptable in most cases.
 To be in the middle of the Pacific at the 19th century and have
a clock synchronous with GMT within few minutes was no simple task,
but that's another (and long) story.
 The point is:
Universal time and synchronous clocks have been used for centuries!
 And you claim that clock's in Oslo and Paris can't be synchronous!
In 2024!
Well, your idiot guru has invented this
absurd in 1905, quite a long time ago,
but idiots like you are making it
lasting.

 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Aug 24 * Space-time interval (2)72Richard Hachel
12 Aug 24 +* Re: Space-time interval (2)70Python
12 Aug 24 i`* Re: Space-time interval (2)69Richard Hachel
12 Aug 24 i +- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Python
13 Aug 24 i `* Re: Space-time interval (2)67Paul.B.Andersen
13 Aug 24 i  +* Re: Space-time interval (2)65Richard Hachel
13 Aug 24 i  i+* Re: Space-time interval (2)2Python
13 Aug 24 i  ii`- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Richard Hachel
13 Aug 24 i  i+* Re: Space-time interval (2)58Paul.B.Andersen
13 Aug 24 i  ii+- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Richard Hachel
13 Aug 24 i  ii+- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i  ii`* Re: Space-time interval (2)55Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i  ii +* Re: Space-time interval (2)50gharnagel
14 Aug 24 i  ii i+* Re: Space-time interval (2)10Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i  ii ii+- Re: Space-time interval (2)1gharnagel
14 Aug 24 i  ii ii+- Re: Space-time interval (2)1gharnagel
14 Aug 24 i  ii ii+* Re: Space-time interval (2)4Paul.B.Andersen
14 Aug 24 i  ii iii+- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Maciej Wozniak
14 Aug 24 i  ii iii`* Re: Space-time interval (2)2Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i  ii iii `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Paul.B.Andersen
15 Aug 24 i  ii ii+* Re: Space-time interval (2)2Python
15 Aug 24 i  ii iii`- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Python
15 Aug 24 i  ii ii`- Re: Space-time interval (2)1gharnagel
14 Aug 24 i  ii i`* Re: Space-time interval (2)39Maciej Wozniak
14 Aug 24 i  ii i +- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Mubarak Schitov
14 Aug 24 i  ii i `* Re: Space-time interval (2)37Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i  ii i  `* Re: Space-time interval (2)36Python
14 Aug 24 i  ii i   `* Re: Space-time interval (2)35Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i  ii i    +* Re: Space-time interval (2)2Python
15 Aug 24 i  ii i    i`- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Paul.B.Andersen
14 Aug 24 i  ii i    `* Re: Space-time interval (2)32Python
14 Aug 24 i  ii i     +* Re: Space-time interval (2)30Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i  ii i     i+* Re: Space-time interval (2)8gharnagel
14 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii`* Re: Space-time interval (2)7Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii `* Re: Space-time interval (2)6gharnagel
14 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii  `* Re: Space-time interval (2)5gharnagel
14 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii   +- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Ross Finlayson
14 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii   `* Re: Space-time interval (2)3Maciej Wozniak
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii    `* Re: Space-time interval (2)2gharnagel
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii     `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Belgov Turpaev
14 Aug 24 i  ii i     i+- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Python
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     i+* Re: Space-time interval (2)18Mikko
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii`* Re: Space-time interval (2)17Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii +* Re: Space-time interval (2)4Python
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii i`* Re: Space-time interval (2)3Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii i +- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Python
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii i `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Python
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii +* Re: Space-time interval (2)9gharnagel
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii i+* Re: Space-time interval (2)2Python
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii ii`- Re: Space-time interval (2)1gharnagel
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii i`* Re: Space-time interval (2)6Python
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii i `* Re: Space-time interval (2)5Maciej Wozniak
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii i  `* Re: Space-time interval (2)4Python
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii i   `* Re: Space-time interval (2)3Maciej Wozniak
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii i    `* Re: Space-time interval (2)2Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii i     `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Maciej Wozniak
16 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii `* Re: Space-time interval (2)3Mikko
16 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii  `* Re: Space-time interval (2)2Richard Hachel
17 Aug 24 i  ii i     ii   `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Mikko
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     i`* Re: Space-time interval (2)2Paul.B.Andersen
15 Aug 24 i  ii i     i `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Maciej Wozniak
14 Aug 24 i  ii i     `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Python
14 Aug 24 i  ii +* Re: Space-time interval (2)3Paul.B.Andersen
14 Aug 24 i  ii i`* Re: Space-time interval (2)2Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i  ii i `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Paul.B.Andersen
15 Aug 24 i  ii `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Thomas Heger
15 Aug 24 i  i`* Re: Space-time interval (2)4Mikko
15 Aug 24 i  i `* Re: Space-time interval (2)3Richard Hachel
15 Aug 24 i  i  +- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Python
17 Aug 24 i  i  `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1Mikko
14 Aug 24 i  `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1guido wugi
2 Sep 24 `- Re: Space-time interval (2)1JanPB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal