Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
Le 19/08/2024 à 23:31, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :Fuck your needs - I haven't claimed it or anythingW dniu 19.08.2024 o 23:16, Python pisze:This is the only point I need at this step of my post youLe 19/08/2024 à 23:12, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :>W dniu 19.08.2024 o 22:32, Python pisze:>Le 19/08/2024 à 18:08, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :>W dniu 19.08.2024 o 17:07, Python pisze:>Le 19/08/2024 à 16:56, Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :>Le 19/08/2024 à 12:57, Python a écrit :>Are you that delusional that you cannot realize that pretending>
that building and putting at different places two clocks with "identical
functioning (within measurement accuracy)" is impossible is *weird*?
>
Seriously Wozniak?
Yet this is true.
What Wozniak claim is not at all what you pretend to hear there...
>
It's even worse (yes, it is possible!). He claims that two clocks
cannot have the same beat rate.
slander
noun [ C or U ]
uk /ˈslɑːn.dər/ us /ˈslæn.dɚ/
a false spoken statement about someone that damages their reputation, or the making of such a statement:
This is definitely not slander.
As I've definitely never claimed anything like that
like what?
Like the above " that two clocks
cannot have the same beat rate".
choked on.
rate" and read on.Yes, you are.
1. I'm not lying>- it's definitely false, and as you definitely brought>
this lie to damage my reputation - it's definitely a
slander.
Nothing surprising from a piece of [snip profanities]
There is NO WAY to damage your reputation Wozniak, face it.
Still you constantly lie trying to damage it.
2. I do not damage your reputation, even if I'd like to :-DYou don't, but that's still the intention
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.