Sujet : Re: Sync two clocks
De : python (at) *nospam* invalid.org (Python)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 21. Aug 2024, 08:51:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : CCCP
Message-ID : <va46ai$3p3aa$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Le 20/08/2024 à 19:46, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 20.08.2024 o 18:42, Python pisze:
Le 20/08/2024 à 18:38, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 20.08.2024 o 18:22, Python pisze:
Le 20/08/2024 à 18:18, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
Le 20/08/2024 à 17:32, Python a écrit :
>
In short, for A, tB and tA' are simultaneous.
I repeat, for A, tB and tA' are simultaneous.
>
Numbers like t_B or t'_A cannot be "simultaneous". Events
like e1 = "B sends back a light signal to A" or e2 = "A receives
this signal" can be.
>
If this is what you meant, which is likely, then, according
to Einstein-Poincaré *definition* of simultaneity:
>
e1 and e2 are NOT simultaneous for A (nor for B)
>
No.
>
According to Einstein-Poincaré definition of simultaneity
they are not simultaneous.
>
However you like or not this *definition* this is something
you CANNOT deny.
>
A definition cannot be false.
>
If your idiot guru defined a cow as a 6 leg
small animal with chitine armour - would it
be "not false" to you as well, poor halfbrain?
>
>
Who knows?
You surely don't. Or maybe you do and you
will answer
I could. This would mean that I take you seriously. This has
been shown being a waste of time in the past. So why would I?
poor stinker
Nice signature.
Sync two clocks
Re: Sync two clocks
